Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Judicial Transparency and Bail Procedures: Lessons from the Supreme Court’s Ruling
June 20, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title – Kusha Duruka vs. The State of Odisha Case No. – Criminal Appeal No. 303 of 2024 Dated on – 19th January, 2024 Quorum – Hon’b

“The minor contradictions were insufficient to discredit the entire Prosecution’s case, The Supreme Court upheld a conviction in a Murder case spanning four decades”
April 17, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Ramvir @ Saket Singh vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh Dated no.: Criminal Appeal No(s). 1258 of 2010 Order on: 16th April 2024 Quorum: J

The statement of an accused under Section 313 CrPC should not be considered as an evidence: Supreme Court
January 30, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Darshan Singh vs State of Punjab Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 163 of 2010 Decided on: 04.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice B.R. Gavai,

The Appellate courts should be cautious when intervening into convictions of lower courts: Supreme Court
The Appellate courts should be cautious when intervening into convictions of lower courts: Supreme Court
January 30, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Jitendra Kumar Mishra @ Jittu vs State of Madhya Pradesh Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 1348 of 2011 Decided on: 05.01.2024 Quorum: Hon

Legal Conundrum: POCSO Act vs. SC/ST Act – The Bombay High Court’s Perspective
Legal Conundrum: POCSO Act vs. SC/ST Act – The Bombay High Court’s Perspective
October 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title – Dinanath Manik Katkar v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2589 of 2023 CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. Decid

ANALYZING THE GROUNDS AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE ACQUITTAL OF THE RESPONDENT-ACCUSED IN THE HIGH-PROFILE CORRUPTION CASE: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
ANALYZING THE GROUNDS AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE ACQUITTAL OF THE RESPONDENT-ACCUSED IN THE HIGH-PROFILE CORRUPTION CASE: BOMBAY HIGH COURT

INTRODUCTION The High Court of Bombay passed a judgement on 04 May 2023. In the case of THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs RAJESAHEB YASHWANT RANE IN CRIM

Caste discrimination is highly condemnable and common burial ground for people of every community and caste should be done as right to dignity encompasses beyond life and is upheld within the ambit of Article 21 of the Constitution: Madras High Court
November 2, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Madras High Court passed a judgment on 29th October, 2021 in which it stated that Common Cremation and Burial grounds should be promoted and th