Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Balancing Liberty and Safety: Witness Protection is No Substitute for Bail Cancellation
Balancing Liberty and Safety: Witness Protection is No Substitute for Bail Cancellation
September 8, 2025by Primelegal Team

Abstract The concept of bail as one of the safeguards of individual liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution has been at the heart of understan

Balancing technicalities and actuality: Revisiting acquittal and conviction under POCSO Act
Balancing technicalities and actuality: Revisiting acquittal and conviction under POCSO Act
September 3, 2025by Primelegal Team

Case Name: SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARI VERSUS HARE RAM SAH & ORS Case Number: SLP(Crl.) No. 18377 of 2024 Date: Monday, the First Day of September, T

SC Examines Whether Article 32 Allows Reconsideration of Death Sentences after Finality
SC Examines Whether Article 32 Allows Reconsideration of Death Sentences after Finality
August 29, 2025by Primelegal Team

Introduction On 28 August 2025, the Supreme Court of India examined an important question regarding when Article 32 of the Constitution permits cou

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES LEGAL PRINCIPLES IN ABETMENT TO SUICIDE CASE
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES LEGAL PRINCIPLES IN ABETMENT TO SUICIDE CASE
August 20, 2025by Primelegal Team

Case Name: Abhinav Mohan Delkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.   Case Number: Criminal Appeal Nos. 2177-2185 of 2024   Date: Sunday, th

Karnataka HC Upholds FIR Against Woman Under POCSO, Reiterates Gender-Neutral Scope of Act
Karnataka HC Upholds FIR Against Woman Under POCSO, Reiterates Gender-Neutral Scope of Act
August 19, 2025by Primelegal Team

Introduction    The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2015, is India’s landmark legislation for protecting and safeg

Supreme Court: Post-Divorce Continuation of Criminal Proceedings is Futile; 498A Case against Father-in-Law Quashed
Supreme Court: Post-Divorce Continuation of Criminal Proceedings is Futile; 498A Case against Father-in-Law Quashed
August 18, 2025by Primelegal Team

Case Name: Navneesh Aggarwal & Others vs State of Haryana & Another Case Number: Criminal Appeal No. ___ of 2025 (Arising out of Special Le

SC Clarifies FIR Statement of One Accused Has No Evidentiary Value against Co-Accused
SC Clarifies FIR Statement of One Accused Has No Evidentiary Value against Co-Accused
August 13, 2025by Primelegal Team

Introduction In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has reiterated that an accused cannot confer the status of a confession to an eked-

Judicial Transparency and Bail Procedures: Lessons from the Supreme Court’s Ruling
June 20, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title – Kusha Duruka vs. The State of Odisha Case No. – Criminal Appeal No. 303 of 2024 Dated on – 19th January, 2024 Quorum – Hon’b

“The minor contradictions were insufficient to discredit the entire Prosecution’s case, The Supreme Court upheld a conviction in a Murder case spanning four decades”
April 17, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case title: Ramvir @ Saket Singh vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh Dated no.: Criminal Appeal No(s). 1258 of 2010 Order on: 16th April 2024 Quorum: J

The statement of an accused under Section 313 CrPC should not be considered as an evidence: Supreme Court
January 30, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case title: Darshan Singh vs State of Punjab Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 163 of 2010 Decided on: 04.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice B.R. Gavai,