Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
PRIME LEGAL | Elevating Urban Mobility: Supreme Court Declares Right to Walk a Fundamental Right Under Article 19 in Maniyar Iliyaz
PRIME LEGAL | Elevating Urban Mobility: Supreme Court Declares Right to Walk a Fundamental Right Under Article 19 in Maniyar Iliyaz
June 22, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Maniyar Iliyaz and Ors. v. P.Ayyappan and Ors. CASE NUMBER: Civil Appeal No. 4665-4666/2025 COURT: Supreme Court of India DATE: 19 June

PRIME LEGAL | Mandating ‘Mens Rea’: Bombay High Court Rules Lawful Debt Recovery Does Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide
PRIME LEGAL | Mandating ‘Mens Rea’: Bombay High Court Rules Lawful Debt Recovery Does Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide
June 22, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Amit Padmakar More & Others v. The State of Maharashtra & Another  CASE NUMBER: Criminal Application No. 412 of 2025  COURT: H

PRIME LEGAL | DEEPFAKES AND THE LAW: IS INDIAN LAW PREPARED FOR SYNTHETIC REALITY?
PRIME LEGAL | DEEPFAKES AND THE LAW: IS INDIAN LAW PREPARED FOR SYNTHETIC REALITY?
June 20, 2026by Primelegal Team

ABSTRACT With the advent of the Deepfake technology, which is the AI-generated creation of realistic yet fictional audio-visual content, it has bec

PRIME LEGAL | The Evidentiary Value Of WhatsApp Chats Under Indian Law: A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Evidence?
PRIME LEGAL | The Evidentiary Value Of WhatsApp Chats Under Indian Law: A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Evidence?
June 20, 2026by Primelegal Team

ABSTRACT “Today, with instant messaging becoming the most popular form of communication both personally, professionally, and criminally, WhatsApp

PRIME LEGAL | Supreme Court Invokes Art.142 to Set Aside POSCO Conviction, Allows Couple to Live ‘Peacefully’ as Spouses 
PRIME LEGAL | Supreme Court Invokes Art.142 to Set Aside POSCO Conviction, Allows Couple to Live ‘Peacefully’ as Spouses 
June 19, 2026by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India in a decision that has won admiration and much criticism upheld the conviction and a ten-year prison term o

PRIME LEGAL | Delhi High Court Reserves Verdict: Will Telegram Be Unbanned Before the NEET Re-Exam?
PRIME LEGAL | Delhi High Court Reserves Verdict: Will Telegram Be Unbanned Before the NEET Re-Exam?
June 19, 2026by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION  The Delhi High Court has yet to make its Final Decision regarding the appeal against the sudden suspension of the Telegram messaging

PRIME LEGAL | AI Tools Cannot Substitute Legal Education, Rules Madras High Court While Denying Relief to Students with Attendance Shortage
PRIME LEGAL | AI Tools Cannot Substitute Legal Education, Rules Madras High Court While Denying Relief to Students with Attendance Shortage
June 18, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Shakthi Shyam  v. The Dean & Ors.  CASE NUMBER: W.A Nos. 49, 364 and 426 of 2026  COURT: Madras High Court  DATE: June 17, 2026

PRIME LEGAL | Supreme Court Boosts Transparency: Lokayukta Police Cannot Claim RTI Exemption as a Security Agency
PRIME LEGAL | Supreme Court Boosts Transparency: Lokayukta Police Cannot Claim RTI Exemption as a Security Agency
June 18, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Special Police Establishment v. Kamta Prasad Mishra & Ors.   CASE NUMBER: Criminal Appeal No. 3743 of 2024   COURT: Supreme Cour

PRIME LEGAL | Homemakers Are Nation Builders; Fixes ₹30,000 Per Month For Loss Of Domestic Care In Motor Accident Compensation Cases
PRIME LEGAL | Homemakers Are Nation Builders; Fixes ₹30,000 Per Month For Loss Of Domestic Care In Motor Accident Compensation Cases
June 17, 2026by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION On 11 June 2026, a Division Bench of the Supreme Court of India, consisting of Justices Sanjay Karol and N. Kotiswar Singh granted a u

PRIME LEGAL | Jharkhand High Court Rules: Lokayukta Cannot Delegate Core Functions Even in Cases Involving Relatives
PRIME LEGAL | Jharkhand High Court Rules: Lokayukta Cannot Delegate Core Functions Even in Cases Involving Relatives
June 17, 2026by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION The Jharkhand High Court made a landmark judgment concerning the operational scope of single-member statutory agencies, ruling that th