Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
PRIMELEGAL | Can Power Lines Cross Private Land Without the Owner’s Consent? MP High Court Explains Section 164
PRIMELEGAL | Can Power Lines Cross Private Land Without the Owner’s Consent? MP High Court Explains Section 164
September 15, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Daulat Ram Engineering Services Ltd v State of Madhya Pradesh CASE NUMBER: Writ Petition No. 49694 of 2025 with Writ Petition No. 32213

PRIME LEGAL | Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Britannia Dairy in Unsafe Cheese Cubes Case
PRIME LEGAL | Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Britannia Dairy in Unsafe Cheese Cubes Case
September 15, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Britannia Dairy Private Limited vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors CASE NUMBER: Criminal Application No. 842 of 2017 COURT: High Cour

PRIME LEGAL | Regulating Paid Securities Promotions on Social Media: Protecting Retail Investors in the Age of Finfluencers
PRIME LEGAL | Regulating Paid Securities Promotions on Social Media: Protecting Retail Investors in the Age of Finfluencers
September 12, 2026by Primelegal Team

ABSTRACT “The rise in the popularity of social media platforms has led to a change in the way that retail investors get their information regardi

PRIME LEGAL | The Blurred Line: A Critical Analysis Of Rule 36 Of The Bci Rules In The Context Of Legal Influencers
PRIME LEGAL | The Blurred Line: A Critical Analysis Of Rule 36 Of The Bci Rules In The Context Of Legal Influencers
September 12, 2026by Primelegal Team

ABSTRACT Under Section 49(1)(c) of the Advocates Act, 1961, the Rule 36 of Bar Council of India Rules have been framed which prohibits advocates fr

PRIMELEGAL | Delhi High Court Protects Taxpayers: Government Cannot Retain Tax Collected Twice on the Same Income
PRIMELEGAL | Delhi High Court Protects Taxpayers: Government Cannot Retain Tax Collected Twice on the Same Income
September 11, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Sojitz Asia Pte. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax (International Tax), New Delhi & Ors. CASE NUMBER: W.P.(C) 7495/2026 & C

PRIME LEGAL | Delhi High Court Sets Advertising Standard: BECO’s Comparative Ads Against Vim and Surf Excel Crossed the Legal Line
PRIME LEGAL | Delhi High Court Sets Advertising Standard: BECO’s Comparative Ads Against Vim and Surf Excel Crossed the Legal Line
September 11, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Kwick Living (I) Private Limited CASE NUMBER: CS(COMM) 904/2026; I.A. 22515/2026 COURT: High Court of Delh

PRIMELEGAL | Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over Voluminous Records in Corruption Cases Delaying Prosecution
PRIMELEGAL | Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over Voluminous Records in Corruption Cases Delaying Prosecution
September 10, 2026by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India has expressed serious reservations on the practice of using too much and mostly irrelevant evidence during

PRIME LEGAL | Supreme Court Questions Prosecution Of Husband For Rape Amid Marital Rape Exception In Indian Law
PRIME LEGAL | Supreme Court Questions Prosecution Of Husband For Rape Amid Marital Rape Exception In Indian Law
September 10, 2026by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court has reopened one of Indian criminal law’s most contested questions: can a husband be prosecuted for rape while

PRIMELEGAL | Supreme Court Sets Out Three-Stage Test to Attribute Mens Rea to a Company in Criminal Liability Cases
PRIMELEGAL | Supreme Court Sets Out Three-Stage Test to Attribute Mens Rea to a Company in Criminal Liability Cases
September 9, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Sanofi India Ltd. v Central Bureau of Investigation CASE NUMBER: Criminal Appeal No. 4250 of 2026 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 3597 OF

PRIME LEGAL | Calcutta High Court Rules: No Injunction in Defamation Unless Court Is Satisfied the Defence of Truth Will Certainly Fail at Trial
PRIME LEGAL | Calcutta High Court Rules: No Injunction in Defamation Unless Court Is Satisfied the Defence of Truth Will Certainly Fail at Trial
September 9, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Anil Kaushik and Anr. Vs. Sourabh Khemani CASE NUMBER: FMAT 220 of 2026, with CAN 1 of 2026 and CAN 2 of 2026.  COURT: Calcutta High Co