Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
If the plaintiff has no knowledge, as to who is the actual owner prior and after 15th August, 1947 the year 1947 to onward, then the plaintiff cannot take a plea that his adverse possession was openly hostile to the actual owner of the suit property: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team

The appeal fails and is hereby dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of BAPULAL V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH COLLECTOR

CONTINUE READING
The provision of Section 16(4) is procedural in nature, and respondents should not take away the right of filing of return with a late fee. There should be a scope of application of mind and consideration of non-filing of return within time while applying Section 16(4) of the CGST Act: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The provision of Section 16(4) is procedural in nature, and respondents should not take away the right of filing of return with a late fee. There should be a scope of application of mind and consideration of non-filing of return within time while applying Section 16(4) of the CGST Act: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team

The writ petition stands dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of M/S R.K. MODI AND SONS V. UNION OF INDIA through HON

CONTINUE READING
The report is completely silent about the status of the seal put by W&M Department, therefore, DRP has rightly found that it is a case of ‘Major Irregularity’ and punishment should be awarded treating alleged irregularity as ‘Major Irregularity’: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The report is completely silent about the status of the seal put by W&M Department, therefore, DRP has rightly found that it is a case of ‘Major Irregularity’ and punishment should be awarded treating alleged irregularity as ‘Major Irregularity’: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team

The writ petition is disposed of by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of M/S GAGAN AUTOMOBILES V. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. thro

CONTINUE READING
Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act provides that where any borrower, who is under a liability to a secured creditor under a security agreement, makes any default in repayment of secured debt or any instalment thereof, the secured creditor shall be entitled to exercise all or any of the rights under sub-section (4) of Section 13: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act provides that where any borrower, who is under a liability to a secured creditor under a security agreement, makes any default in repayment of secured debt or any instalment thereof, the secured creditor shall be entitled to exercise all or any of the rights under sub-section (4) of Section 13: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team

The writ petition is dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of BANK OF BARODA DEWAS BRANCH V. RAJENDRA SONI through HON

CONTINUE READING
In the present case, even if the petitioner was found absent from duty for which she has submitted an explanation with necessary documents, then enquiry ought to have been conducted. If after enquiry the charges are found proved, then only the punishment order ought to have been passed: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
In the present case, even if the petitioner was found absent from duty for which she has submitted an explanation with necessary documents, then enquiry ought to have been conducted. If after enquiry the charges are found proved, then only the punishment order ought to have been passed: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team

The writ appeal is dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH V. SMT. NIRMALA RAWAT through HONR

CONTINUE READING
No RTI can be filed to request “A” diaries of civil and criminal proceedings: Kerala High Court
No RTI can be filed to request “A” diaries of civil and criminal proceedings: Kerala High Court
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team

No RTI can be filed to request “A” diaries of civil and criminal proceedings is upheld by the Kerala High Court in the case of M.P. Cho

CONTINUE READING
Family Courts lack the authority to enjoin someone from performing talaq or a second marriage in accordance with personal law: Kerala High Court
Family Courts lack the authority to enjoin someone from performing talaq or a second marriage in accordance with personal law: Kerala High Court
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team

Family Courts lack the authority to enjoin someone from performing talaq or a second marriage in accordance with personal law is upheld by the Kera

CONTINUE READING
The argument that the rape victim had reached majority and was happily cohabitating with the accused is not a viable premise or justification for dismissing the criminal proceedings: Kerala High Court
The argument that the rape victim had reached majority and was happily cohabitating with the accused is not a viable premise or justification for dismissing the criminal proceedings: Kerala High Court
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team

The argument that the rape victim had reached majority and was happily cohabitating with the accused is not a viable premise or justification for d

CONTINUE READING
The exemption from payment of tax payable under section 9 and 10 of Madhya Pradesh Vanijyik Kar Adhiniyam, 1994 was given to the petitioner. In the Month of December 2004, the State Government has inserted section 10-B by way of amendment and thereby notified ‘Soybean’ as goods for payment of entry tax. After the amendment, the respondent has issued notice to the petitioner for payment of tax: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 26, 2022by Primelegal Team

The writ petition stands allowed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of DEWAS SOYA LIMITED V. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX DEPTT

CONTINUE READING
S.231(2) is a tool available to the defense to defer the cross examination of the prosecution witnesses until other witnesses are examined, this is for the reason that many a times the defense of an accused cannot be opened at the initial stage which may allow the other prosecution witnesses to be prepared for the same: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
S.231(2) is a tool available to the defense to defer the cross examination of the prosecution witnesses until other witnesses are examined, this is for the reason that many a times the defense of an accused cannot be opened at the initial stage which may allow the other prosecution witnesses to be prepared for the same: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 26, 2022by Primelegal Team

The Miscellaneous Criminal Case stands allowed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of RAVI V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH through

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.