Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
rohitjain_bhopalgas_0
SUPREME COURT”S NEW ORDER IN BHOPAL GAS TRAGEDY DISPOSAL
February 18, 2025by Primelegal Team0

INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India has now started to deal with the toxic waste that was collected from the site of the Bhopal gas tragedy whi

fb
SUPREME COURT PROPOSES OVERHAUL OF SCBA ELECTIONS WITH REFORM COMMITTEE
February 18, 2025by Primelegal Team0

INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India has set a major reform initiative for the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) elections in motion. Respond

images
THE COURT SETS ASIDE DEATH SENTENCE DUE TO DENIAL OF FAIR TRIAL
February 18, 2025by Primelegal Team0

INTRODUCTION In a milestone judgment, the Supreme Court of India set aside the conviction and death penalty of Sovaran Singh Prajapati on the basis

Criminal-Law
JUDGEMENT REVIEW: LACK OF EVIDENCE AND DELAY IN PROCEDURE LEAD TO ACQUITTAL IN DACOITY CASE
February 17, 2025by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Vinod Nasmulla vs. The State of Chhattisgarh Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: 2025 INSC 220 Bench: Justice Pamidighantam Sri Nar

vedanta-moves-sc-against-goa-cess (1)
PUJA FERRO ALLOYS PVT. LTD. VS. STATE OF GOA: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS REBATE WITHDRAWAL AND RECOVERY OF BENEFITS
February 17, 2025by Primelegal Team0

Case Details Case Name: Puja Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Goa & Ors. Case Number: Civil Appeal Nos. 2027-2028 of 2012 Date: February 14,

SCI-banner
NAVIGATING LEGAL COMPLEXITIES: THE MSRTC VS. MAHADEO NAIK KRISHNA CASE
February 17, 2025by Primelegal Team0

Case Name: Maharashtra State Road Transport Corp Vs Mahadeo Krishna Naik Case Number: Civil Appeal No.13834 Of 2024 Date: February 14, 2025 Quorum:

Writ
ARTICLE 226: WRIT COURTS MAY REFUSE ACTION IF JUSTICE REQUIRES
February 17, 2025by Primelegal Team0

INTRODUCTION Article 226 of the Indian Constitution empowers High Courts to issue writs in aid of the enforcement of fundamental rights and other l

Screenshot_20200629-201321_2.original-768x432
JUDGEMENT REVIEW : COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT IS A MATTER OF POLICY AND CANNOT BE DECIDED BY COURTS
February 17, 2025by Primelegal Team0

Case Name: Canara Bank vs. Ajithkumar G. Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: 2025 INSC 184 Bench: Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Prashant K

1111
B.V. RAM KUMAR VS. STATE OF TELANGANA & ANOTHER: QUASHING OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS FROM WORKPLACE DISPUTES-ACTIONS AGAINST GODSEND CONSIDERATION
February 17, 2025by Primelegal Team0

Case Details Case Name: B.V. Ram Kumar vs. State of Telangana Case Number: Criminal Appeal No. (SLP (Crl.) No. 7887 of 2024) Date: February 10, 202

1111
HIGH COURT’S INHERENT POWER TO QUASH PROCEEDINGS
February 17, 2025by Primelegal Team0

Case Name: Naushey Ali and Ors. V.  State of U.P & Anr.  Case Number: Application u/s 482 No. – 7826 of 2024 Date: February 11, 2025 Quorum