Basic Concepts of Mergers and Acquisitions
Introduction Merger and acquisition, these two words we often associate with the company laws. Thus from the six-lettered word merger, we may devel
Attaining the age of majority do not decide maturity: Punjab and Haryana HC
In the case of Preeti and another v. State of Haryana and others, [CRWP-4181-2020 (O&M)], the High court of Punjab and Haryana had stated that
Teacher who attains the age of superannuation mid-year has right to re-employment – Supreme Court
In the case of Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal Vs State of Uttarakhand And Ors [Civil Appeal No. 3493/2020] Supreme Court held that the very object and in
Law of limitation binds everybody including the government – Supreme Court
In the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs Bherulal [Special Leave Petition (C) Diary No. 9217 of 2020] Supreme Court held that Supreme Court of Ind
Victim’s testimony can solely be a ground for conviction of the accused- SC
In the case of Ganesan v. State Represented by its Inspector of Police (CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 680 of 2020), the Supreme Court had held that the
Constitutional validity of Section 43(5) of RERA: Punjab & Haryana HC
In the case of Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. V. State of Haryana and others (CWP No. 38144 of 2018), the Punjab & Haryana HC, had decided upon
Plea for transfer of case cannot be on apprehension – Supreme Court
In the case of Umesh Kumar Sharma Vs State of Uttarakhand & Ors. [Transfer Petition Crl No. 534-536 of 2019] Supreme Court held that only when
Wife can claim the property belonging to the husband’s relatives – SC
In the case of Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja, (CIVIL APPEAL NO.2483 of 2020), the Supreme Court had held that in the matter of domestic viole
Breach of natural justice cannot be said to be prejudiced – Supreme Court
In the case of State of UP Vs Sudhir Kumar Singh & Ors [Civil Appeal No. 3498 of 2020] Supreme Court held that natural justice is a flexible to
Accused gets an indefeasible right to default bail – Supreme Court
In the case of Saravanan Vs State represented by the Inspector of Police [Arising from S.L.P. (Criminal) Nos.43864387/ 2020] Hon’ble Supreme Cour
