Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
COURT OF EQUITY EXERCISING JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 WILL HAVE TO BE MINDFUL OF THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND ENSURE THAT IN RIGIDLY APPLYING TECHNICAL RULES OF PROCEDURE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE DOES NOT RESULT: ODISHA HIGH COURT
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of THE CHIEF JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK in the case of Rames

Employee can be suspended if a criminal case is pending or a departmental enquiry is contemplated against him provided required conditions are satisfied: Telangana High Court
June 14, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Telangana through the learned bench led by a Division Bench of CHIEF JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SIN

There cannot be a thorough determination of the petitioner’s rights without the participation of other parties: Karnataka high court.
June 11, 2022by Primelegal Team0

There cannot be a complete adjudication of the petitioner’s rights unless the third parties are also heard, is upheld by the High Court of Karnat

Defamation-S.499 IPC, First Exception-Defence of public good, held, a question of fact, to be seen during the trial and not at the stage of summons.. : Allahabad High Court
June 11, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Section 499: Defamation– Anyone who, by words spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or visible representations, makes or publishes any i

Writ Petition can’t be filed for police negligence and delays during investigation: Telangana High Court

This particular judgement is upheld by Telangana High Court by Justice Lalitha Kanneganti in case of K. Savya v. Station House Officer (WRIT PETITI

Excise  has jurisdiction  to  pass  order  for  release  of  seized  vehicle  during pendency  of  trial: Patna High Court.

A writ Petition was filled by Manoj  Ram  S/o-  Late  Krishan  Ram,  Resident  of  Village- Kondi,  P.S.Pandarak, District- Patna against

Technicality  in the  procedural  law  is  not  available  as  a  defence  when  a matter  of  grave  public  importance  is  for  consideration before  the  court: Patna High Court.

A writ Petition was filled by the Petitioner Satyendra  Kumar  Construction  Pvt.  Ltd.  having  its  registered  office  at  202, Hira 

Impugned order dated 6th April, 2022 under Section 148A(d) and notice under Section 148 of the the Income Tax Act, 1961 are quashed: High Court Of Delhi
Impugned order dated 6th April, 2022 under Section 148A(d) and notice under Section 148 of the the Income Tax Act, 1961 are quashed: High Court Of Delhi

The impugned order dated 6th April, 2022 under Section 148A(d) and notice under Section 148 of the Act are quashed was upheld by the High Court Of

Learned ASJ failed to consider all the material facts and fell into error in accepting the contention of limitation: High Court Of Delhi

The impugned order is set aside. The trial shall proceed from the stage it was, when the impugned order was passed, namely, recordal of prosecution

Starbucks Corporation filed a case on TEAQUILA A FASHION CAFE & ANR. In Teaquila A Fashion Café in High Court Of Delhi

Decree of damages is passed in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendants for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-. Cost of Rs.9,60,100/- is awarded in f

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { var links = document.querySelectorAll('a'); links.forEach(function(link) { if (link.innerHTML.trim() === 'Career' && link.href === 'https://primelegal.in/contact-us/') { link.href = 'https://primelegal.in/career/'; } }); });