Incriminating evidence is required to convict – Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court held that mere non-explanation on the part of the appellant, by itself cannot lead to proof of guilt against the appellant held b
Keeping a child in adverse conditions and causing bodily pain to the child fulfils the ingredients of the offence of ‘hurt’ under Section 319 IPC : Delhi High Court
When a child is kept in confinement and is crying, it is a condition adverse to the normal condition and thereby fulfilling the ingredients of the
While quashing the Criminal Proceedings where the parties have settled the matter between themselves the Court has to secure ends of justice and prevent the abuse of the process of any court: High Court of Meghalaya
The Supreme Court has held that the High Court u/s 482 of the Code has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings even in cases which are not
If the petitioner is considered for promotion to the next higher post of, the promotion cannot be given with retrospective effect: High Court of Meghalaya
The writ Court, which exercises its high prerogative jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not so readily equipped for the
In a Mandamus appeal, interference is usually warranted only when palpable infirmities or perversities are noticed: High Court of Meghalaya
In an IntraCourt Mandamus appeal, interference is usually warranted only when palpable infirmities or perversities are noticed as held by the Hon
For a person to be charged for commission of a particular offence, the material relied upon by the prosecution must be of such nature that can be translated into evidence: High Court of J&K and Ladakh
No doubt while framing the charge, no reasons are required to be given but nonetheless, once the learned trial court mentions in its order that the
When there’s a reasonable apprehension of arrest then the person is entitled to approach the competent court of jurisdiction for relief : High Court of Meghalaya
When there’s a reasonable apprehension of arrest then the person is entitled to approach the competent court of jurisdiction for relief and if he
Courts are slow to interfere with any stated stipulation with regard to age made by the state policy: High Court of Meghalaya
Prescription of age limit and relaxation is made in furtherance of the policy of the State, and the same constitutes a policy decision made, which
Bail denied to the petitioner alleged of kidnapping and physically abusing the informant: High Court Of Patna
The Petitioner was alleged to have tried to kidnap the two girls and forcefully taking them to a place. The girls managed to escape and informed a
The person alleged of taking huge amounts from the people in the name of giving jobs in the Civil Court granted bail: High Court Of Patna
The Petitioner was alleged for taking huge amounts from the informant in the name of giving a job in the Civil Court which turned out to be false a
