Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
“International Jurisdictional Battle: Delhi Family Court Rejects Anti-Suit Injunction, Allows USA Divorce Proceedings in Disputed Matrimonial Case”
“International Jurisdictional Battle: Delhi Family Court Rejects Anti-Suit Injunction, Allows USA Divorce Proceedings in Disputed Matrimonial Case”
January 5, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Shri Sumit Sapra v Smt. Akansha Ahuja Sapra  Case No: MAT.APP.(F.C.) 358/2023 & CM APPL. 62410/2023 Decided on: 3rd January 2024 C

CONTINUE READING
Karnataka High Court passes a judgement against BDA for violating provision under section 69 of the KTCP Act
Karnataka High Court passes a judgement against BDA for violating provision under section 69 of the KTCP Act
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Title: Late H.H. Jyotendra Sinhji Vikramsinhji & anr v State of Karnataka & anr Citation:  WP No. 1678 of 2018 Dated on: 15.12.2023 Corum:

CONTINUE READING
The SC directed the (SEBI) and the Union government’s investigative agencies to look into whether the loss suffered by Indian investors as a result of the Hindenburg research and any other entities taking short positions violated the law.
The SC directed the (SEBI) and the Union government’s investigative agencies to look into whether the loss suffered by Indian investors as a result of the Hindenburg research and any other entities taking short positions violated the law.
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title:  Vishal Tiwari v. Union of India Case No: W.P.(C) No. 162/2023 Decided on: 3rd January 2024 CORAM: DY Chandrachud, Chief Justice of In

CONTINUE READING
The Supreme Court ruled that administrative High Court Chief Justices do not have the authority to usurp the executive’s regulatory authority.
The Supreme Court ruled that administrative High Court Chief Justices do not have the authority to usurp the executive’s regulatory authority.
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. v. Association of Retired Supreme Court and High Court Judges at Allahabad & Ors Case No: CIV

CONTINUE READING
Delhi High Court directed KVS to grant admission to petitioner’s ward, who was denied the same on the grounds that EWS certificate was not issued by govt of Delhi but UP.
Delhi High Court directed KVS to grant admission to petitioner’s ward, who was denied the same on the grounds that EWS certificate was not issued by govt of Delhi but UP.
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Hare Krishna Pathak vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. Case No: W.P.(C) 3041/2022 & CM APPL. 8955/2023 Decided on: 22nd Dec

CONTINUE READING
Delhi High court upholds the fundamental right of a disabled person and prevents the transfer of the petitioner to another State.
Delhi High court upholds the fundamental right of a disabled person and prevents the transfer of the petitioner to another State.
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Title: Bhavneeth Singh v IRCON international Limited Citation: W.P.(C) 12404/2022 & CM APPL.  No. 37256/2022 Dated on: 15.12.2023 Corum: Justi

CONTINUE READING
The Previous Order Which Is Correct In Law Can Not Be Modified By The Interim Application : Bombay HC
The Previous Order Which Is Correct In Law Can Not Be Modified By The Interim Application : Bombay HC
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Mangaka Sarosh Bana v Renuka alias Rekha Satish Narwankar   CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Milind N Jadhav DATE :  3rd January 2024 CITATION :

CONTINUE READING
Appellate Court Upholds Determination of Coparcener Rights in Ancestral Property Dispute: Bombay HC
Appellate Court Upholds Determination of Coparcener Rights in Ancestral Property Dispute: Bombay HC
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Title: Sau. Ushabai Vs Smt. Mainabai and ORS. Citation: SECOND APPEAL NO. 326/2015 Coram: Justice SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR Date: 22/12/23 Facts The case

CONTINUE READING
“Abduction Alone Not Enough, Demands Ransom and Threats to Life Must Be proven for Sec 364A IPC”: SUPREME COURT
“Abduction Alone Not Enough, Demands Ransom and Threats to Life Must Be proven for Sec 364A IPC”: SUPREME COURT
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Neeraj Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh Case No: Criminal Appeal NO. 1420 OF 2019 Decided on:  3 January, 2024 CORAM: Justice Sudhanshu

CONTINUE READING
The Supreme Court Affirms Perumal Raja’s Conviction, Unraveling Legal Nuances and Co-Accused Variances”
The Supreme Court Affirms Perumal Raja’s Conviction, Unraveling Legal Nuances and Co-Accused Variances”
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Perumal Raja @ Perumal vs State Rep. by the Inspector of Police   Case No: Crl. Appeal @ SLP (Crl.) No. 863 of 2019 Decided on:  3 Ja

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.