STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. PRISM CEMENT LTD.: SC UPHOLDS TAX EXEMPTIONS AGAINST RETROSPECTIVE POLICY CHANGES
Case Details: Case Name:- The State of Maharashtra & Ors. vs. Prism Cement Limited Case Number:- Civil Appeal No. 13928 of 2015 Date: 12/02/2
JUDGEMENT REVIEW : COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT IS A MATTER OF POLICY AND CANNOT BE DECIDED BY COURTS
Case Name: Canara Bank vs. Ajithkumar G. Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: 2025 INSC 184 Bench: Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Prashant K
The Balance between Procedural Diligence and Substantive Justice from Abatement to Restoration
Name of the case: Om Prakash Gupta Alias Lalloowa(now deceased) Vs. Satish Chandra(now deceased) Number: Civil Appeal No. 13407 of 2024 Date: 11 Fe
FIR CANNOT BE USED AS SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE IN CASE OF INFORMANT DEATH BEFORE TESTIMONY
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India in a recent ruling has commented that statements recorded in a FIR lose their evidentiary value if the info
FIR CANNOT BE USED AS SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE IN CASE OF INFORMANT DEATH BEFORE TESTIMONY
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India in a recent ruling has commented that statements recorded in a FIR lose their evidentiary value if the info
CHILD PROTECTION LAWS IN SC: POCSO ACT VERDICTS FROM 2024
INTRODUCTION The Protection of Children from Oppression of Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) is a landmark statute in India for protection of child
Tax Offences Committed before Show-cause Notice Can be Treated as First Offence and Compounded
Introduction In a major relief to taxpayers, the Supreme Court of India has held that tax offenses committed prior to the issuance of a show-cause
RECRUITMENT DRIVE AND EMPLOYEE RIGHTSA LEGAL BATTLE OF REGULARIZATION: SPECIAL
Case Name: Rakesh Kumar Charmakar & Ors. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. Case Number: Civil Appeal Nos. 2025 (SLP (C) Nos. 8613-8614 of
JUDGEMENT REVIEW : UNLAWFUL ARREST AND INHUMANE TREATMENT UNDER ARTICLE 21 AND ARTICLE 22
Case Name: Vihaan Kumar vs State of Haryana & Anr Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: 2025 INSC 162 Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justic
Judgement Review : Can a convicted employee be reinstated after acquittal?
Case Name: Airports Authority of India vs. Pradip Kumar Banerjee Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: 2025 INSC 149 Judges: Justice J.K. Maheshw
