KARNATAKA HC SAYS CAB DRIVERS ARE COMPANY EMPLOYEES, FINES OLA RS 5.5 LAKH UNDER POSH
INTRODUCTION The most recent landmark judgement of Karnataka High Court is to consider the driver-subscriber of a transport aggregator like Ola and
SUPREME COURT HANDBOOK LISTS TERMS TO BE AVOIDED TO REFER TO PERSON’S WITH DISABILITIES, PROVIDES ALTERNATIVES
BACKGROUND- The Chief Justice of India Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud on Saturday launched the ‘Handbook Concerning Persons with Disabilities’
EXAMINING ALLEGATIONS OF JUDICIAL MANIPULATION IN THE CHHATTISGARH PDS SCAM
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court on said it will examine the serious allegations of Enforcement Directorate and Chhattisgarh govt that Nagarik Apur
SCOPE AND PROVISIONS OF REMAND UNDER CPC: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS
ABSTRACT Remand, as understood generally, is to send back. This is especially appliable under CPC when the trial court send a case back to the tria
VALUE OF TESTIMONY OF CHILD WITNESS EVIDENTIARY
ABSTRACT It is common for judiciary systems of the worlds to accept children’s testimonies to help solve issues including domestic violence, ra
SUPREME COURT ALLOWS FINAL-YEAR LAW STUDENTS TO APPEAR FOR ALL INDIA BAR EXAMINATION (AIBE)
Background – In the case of Nilay Ray v. Bar Council of India and Ors., the Supreme Court, on September 20, 2024, allowed the final year law st
Legal Framework for Child Witnesses in India: A Critical Analysis
ABSTRACT Witnesses are generally considered to be the root of all evidence from the process of investigation, to a legal proceeding or trials. A ch
BRANDING AND BRAND MANAGEMENT
ABSTRACT This article focuses on brand concept and brand management in the context of the current business environment. Topics covered include a
SUPREME COURT QUASHED THE JUDGEMENT OF HIGH COURT AND AWARDED THE EXTENSION OF TIME IN FILING THE WRITTEN STATEMENT.
CASE NAME: ADITYA KHAITAN & ORS. VERSUS IL AND FS FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED CASE NUMBER: CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6411-6418 OF 2023 DATED ON: OCTOBER
SUPREME COURT UPHELD AND THE JUDGEMENT OF APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY AND SET ASIDE THE CIVIL APPEAL.
CASE NAME: MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS RATNAGIRI GAS AND POWER PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. CASE NUMBER: CIVIL
