MERE EXISTENCE OF BENCHMARK DISABILITY WON’T DISQUALIFY CANDIDATE FROM MBBS COURSE: SUPREME COURT
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India recently issued a landmark judgment addressing the rights of persons with disabilities in relation to medic
If Tree Planting Conditions Are Violated, Will Order Demolition Of Constructions & Restore Land: Supreme Court Warns Project Proponents
INTRODUCTION A stern warning has been given by the Supreme Court of India to project proponents regarding the non-compliance of conditions for comp
SUPREME COURT GRANTS BAIL TO ABHISHEK BOINPALLY IN ED CASE ON DELHI EXCISE POLICY
BACKGROUND- Boinpally was accused of lobbying for certain liquor businessmen based in southern India and transferring money through hawala channe
THE ROLE OF WOMEN IN INDIAN JUDICIARY: Progress & Challenges
ABSTRACT With the advantages of all the traditional stereotypes men have been dominating the legal field so far but to achieve gender equality and
AI in Indian Justice: Enhancing Efficiency or Threatening Fairness?
ABSTRACT During the past decade, rapid growth in the implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) across the legal industry indicates the applica
UNDERSTANDING THE TRENDS TOWARDS GENDER NEUTRALITY UNDER BNS
ABSTRACT The newly added Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) is a comprehensive criminal code which is now recognized for the newly added provisions fo
FROM LAUNDRY BUSINESS TO COURTROOM: EVICTION AND ALLEGED SUBLETTING DISPUTE
CASE NAME: SMT. JULIA RODRIGUES V. SMT. CHANDRA GULAB ADVANI & ORS CASE NO. : Writ Petition No. 6679 of 2003 DATED: 7TH October 2024 QUOR
LATE RETURN, NO RELIEF: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HIGH COURT’S RULING
CASE NAME: M/s. Shriram Investments vs. Commissioner of Income Tax III Chennai CASE NO. : Civil Appeal No. 6274 of 2013 DATED: October 4, 2024 QUOR
GOVERNMENT BODIES ARE EXPECTED TO ACT IN ABSOLUTELY FAIR, REASONABLE AND TRANSPARENT MANNER, PARTICULARLY IN MATTER OF AWARDING MEGA PROJECTS: SUPREME COURT
CASE NAME- BANSHIDHAR CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. Vs. BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED & OTHERS CASE NO.- CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11005 OF 2024 DATE OF
SUPREME COURT CRITICISES TENDENCY OF UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT JUDGE TO MAKE REMARKS AGAINST LAWYERS
BACKGROUND- Supreme Court disapproves comments passed by Uttarakhand High Court judge against a lawyer. The Supreme Court has expressed its displ
