#legalnews Archives - Page 2 of 13 - Prime Legal Law Firm Blogs

SUPREME COURT’S CLARIFICATION IN IRCTC V/S BRANDAVAN : ARBITRATOR CANNOT REWRITE THE CONTRACT

CASE NAME: Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corp. Ltd. versus M/s. Brandavan Food Products (and connected cases) CASE NUMBER : Petition for S

Grounds of Arrest Must Be in Writing, Rules Supreme Court Under Article 22(1)

Case Name: Mihir Rajesh Shah V. State Of Maharashtra And Another Case Number: Criminal Appeal No.2195 Of 2025 Date: Wednesday, the Sixth day of Nov

Judicial Approach to Balancing Free Speech and Hate Speech in India

ABSTRACT Freedom of speech is an essence to the democratic society at large. It becomes vulnerable when free speech challenges constitutional moral

DELHI HIGH COURT | INTERNATIONAL WORKERS SUBJECT TO MANDATORY PROVIDENT FUND CONTRIBUTIONS

INTRODUCTION The Hon’ble Delhi High Court has ruled that international workers employed in Indian establishments who are not covered by any socia

Kerala High Court Strengthens Juvenile Justice: Key Directions to Enforce SC Guidelines and Act Provisions Effectively

INTRODUCTION Upholding the needed strong and sensitive child protection framework, the Hon’ble Kerala High Court issued fifteen directives to eff

KERALA HIGH COURT | ‘DR.’ PREFIX RESTRICTED TO MEDICAL DEGREE HOLDERS ONLY

INTRODUCTION It is an undeniable fact that there has been a long standing controversy regarding the use of the prefix ‘ Dr.’ by Physiotherapist

Delhi High Court | Sets Aside of Judgment Rendered Without Jurisdiction under the Juvenile Justice Act

Case Name – X v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & ANR Case Number – CRL.REV.P. 484/2024 & CRL.M.A. 20096/2024, CRL.M.A. 22133/2024,

Bombay High Court Reinforces Article 19(1)(g): Freedom to Carry on Lawful Business Cannot Be Arbitrarily Curtailed

Case name: Rajinder Singh Sohan Singh v. The Municipal Corporation of greater Mumbai & Anr. Case Number: 3004 of 2019 Court: High Court of Judi

WELFARE ABOVE ALL: DELHI HIGH COURT UPHOLDS CHILD’S BEST INTEREST IN CUSTODY DISPUTE

CASE NAME: IT v. ANT CASE NUMBER : MAT.APP.(F.C.) 55/2025 DATE : 4 November 2011 QUORUM: Justice Anil Kshetarpal, Justice Harsh Vaidyanathan Shan

Supreme Court Reserves Verdict on Determining Seniority Rules for District Judges

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The Supreme Court on Tuesday, 4TH of November, 2025 reserved its verdict on whether uniform, nationwide criteria should

Blogs And Articles