#judgment Archives - Prime Legal Law Firm Blogs

Delhi High Court Clarifies Judicial Order Scope: ORS Label Ruling Does Not Authorize Continued Misleading Manufacturing

Introduction Dr. Sivaranjani Santosh saw what she described as a people’s victory on October 14, 2025, following eight years of advocacy. The

Mere financial aid does not create master-servant relationships- Supreme Court

Facts The employees of the UP Cooperative Bank Ltd formed an employees’ society called the UP Cooperative Bank Employees Society. The UP Cooperat

Religious Gatherings and Charity Outside the Purview of Conversion Laws: Supreme Court Clarifies in the SHUATS Case

FACTS In this case, multiple FIRs were lodged in Uttar Pradesh. The first FIR (FIR No. 224/2022) alleged mass conversion of 90 persons at a Maundy

Who Can Touch the Sacred Idol? Kerala High Court’s Surprising Padmanabhaswamy Temple Purity Ruling

Introduction The Indian legal system sometimes overrides the established procedure and rule of law in case a custom exists in society. The customs

Supreme Court Quashes SHUATS Cases: Religious Gatherings and Charity Excluded from UP Conversion Act Scope

Introduction The Supreme Court has quashed several FIRs registered in Uttar Pradesh against the Vice-Chancellor and other university officials of S

Madras High Court Clarifies: Getting a Gun License Is a Privilege, Renewing It Is a Legal Right

Facts The petitioner, Magudapathi, was issued a gun license in 2021. This license was previously renewed once without any problems. Later when Magu

Arbitration Under Review: SC Grants Courts Broader Authority

Case Name: GAYATRI BALASAMY VS MS ISG NOVASOFT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED Case Number: 2025 INSC 605 Quorum: Five-Judge Bench Date of Judgment: Apr

NO COMMON INTENTION IS ESTABLISHED UNDER SEC 34 IPC – SC RESORTS TRIAL COURT ACQUITTAL

Case name: CONSTABLE 907 SURENDRA SINGH & ANR VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Case number: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 788 OF 2013 Date: 28-01-2025 Quorum:

Sukhadwala v. Sohni: Tenancy Rights Legal Feud

CASE NAME: Soli Behram Sukhadwala Vs Nitin D. SohniI and ORS. CASE NO.: Civil Revision Application No.187 OF 2007 with Civil Application No.395 of

No Evidence, No Case: Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Marital Dispute.

Abhishek Saxena v. State of Uttar Pradesh. Case No.: Criminal Appeal No. 3628 of 2023. Court: Supreme Court of India. Date: November 28, 2023. Quor

Blogs And Articles