A Clash at the Crossing: Vindictiveness vs. Fair Discipline in the Armed Forces
CASE NAME: S.P PANDEY v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS CASE NO.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 6186 of 2018 DATED: October 21, 2024. QUORUM: PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASI
JUSTICE ON THE ROAD: SUPREME COURT’S LANDMARK RULING ON MOTOR ACCIDENTS COMPENSATION
INTRODUCTION With the rapid increase in the population, the number of vehicles on the road has also risen, provoking a greater number of road acci
KARNATAKA HC SAYS CAB DRIVERS ARE COMPANY EMPLOYEES, FINES OLA RS 5.5 LAKH UNDER POSH
INTRODUCTION The most recent landmark judgement of Karnataka High Court is to consider the driver-subscriber of a transport aggregator like Ola and
Bombay HC: Compensation Based on Dependency & Income
Case Title – THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., MUMBAI THR. MUMBAI LEGAL HUB V. VIVEK NIWAS PATIL AND ANR. Case No. – Civil Appeal FA/168/2024 D
Occupants’ Rights Upheld: Supreme Court Orders Rehabilitation or Compensation Under Town Planning Scheme.
CASE TITLE – Jaffar Ali Nawab Ali Chaudhari & Ors. v. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai CASE NUMBER – Civil Appeal No.… of 2023
Gauhati Court Rules Driver’s Negligence Responsible for Accident: NFR Not Liable for Compensation in Unmanned Railway Crossing Case
Case title: UNION OF INDIA & ANR VS PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA Case no.: Case No.: MACApp. /349/2013
Indigency Status Misjudged: Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order; Urges Quick Appeal Decision.
CASE TITLE – ALIFIYA HUSENBHAI KESHARIYA v. SIDDIQ ISMAIL SINDHI & ORS. CASE NUMBER – (Neutral Citation: 2024 INSC 457) DATED ON – 27.05.
Indigency Status Misjudged: Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order; Urges Quick Appeal Decision.
CASE TITLE – ALIFIYA HUSENBHAI KESHARIYA v. SIDDIQ ISMAIL SINDHI & ORS. CASE NUMBER – (Neutral Citation) 2024 INSC 457 DATED ON – 27.05.2
Karnataka HC upholds that accidental fall from train entitles to receive compensation from the railway tribunals even if that falls within the ambit of “self-infliction”‘.
Case title: Rojamani (since deceased represented by LRs) and Union Bank of India. Case no: M.F.A. NO.3651/2016 (RCT) Dated on: 19thApril, 2024 Quor
“Withholding wages for absurd reasons is violative of fundamental rights of the workers- Bombay High Court”
Case title: Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Shri. Dattatraya Ganpat Bankhele Case No.: WRIT PETITION NO. 2574 OF 2017 Dated: Ap
