Burden of Proof Not Met: Supreme Court Overturns Murder Conviction.
CASE TITLE – Sharanappa v. State of Karnataka CASE NUMBER – Criminal Appeal No. 1673 of 2011 DATED ON – 04.10.2023 QUORUM – Justice Abhay S
Gauhati HC rejects Uxoricide conviction due to weak Circumstantial evidence
CASE TITLE – Abdul Sukkur v. The State of Assam CASE NUMBER – Criminal Appeal [J] no. 84/2017 DATED ON – 22.05.2024 QUORUM – Justice Manish
“Supreme Court Overturns Conviction: Lack of Conclusive Evidence Leads to Acquittal in Landmark Criminal Appeal”
Case Title – Arun Shankar Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh (2024 INSC 298) Case Number – Criminal Appeal No. 001186-001186/2022 Order Number
The High Court cannot interfere in the Criminal Acquittal Appeal unless the findings of the Trial Judge is Perverse or Impossible: Supreme Court
Case title: Ballu @ Balram @ Balmukund and Anr Vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 1167 of 2018 Decision on: April 2nd, 20
The statement of an accused under Section 313 CrPC should not be considered as an evidence: Supreme Court
Case title: Darshan Singh vs State of Punjab Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 163 of 2010 Decided on: 04.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice B.R. Gavai,
Circumstantial evidence may not lead to an accurate decision in the execution of justice says Punjab High Court
TITLE – Kaur v State of Punjab Decided On- :16.06.2023 CRR-684-2007 (O&M) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY INTRODUCTION –
