Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Daughter’s Right in Coparcenary Property:  Bombay High Court Affirms.
Daughter’s Right in Coparcenary Property:  Bombay High Court Affirms.
June 24, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title – Kamalakar Purushotam Inamdar & Ors. vs. Smt. Rajani Shriram Madiwale & Ors. Case No. – Second Appeal No. 335, 336 of 201

Supreme Court Directs the High Court to Re-examine Employee Regularization Dispute: Requested the High Court to Expedite the Prolonged Litigation
May 17, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title – Solapur Municipal Corporation Vs. Shankarrao Govindrao Patil & Ors. Etc. 2024 INSC 423 Case Number – Civil Appeal No. 9127-913

“Bombay High Court Confirmed Civil Judge’s Removal from Service: Upholding Judicial Integrity Through Substantial Evidence of Misconduct and the Importance of Upholding Judicial Integrity.”
April 25, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title – Aniruddha Ganesh Pathak Vs. Registrar General, Bombay High Court & Anr. Case Number – Writ Petition No. 15539 of 2022 Dated on

Bombay High Court directed the State of Maharashtra to formulate SOP in order to avoid the need for Court’s approval in MTP exceeding 24 Weeks
April 13, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case title: ABC Vs State of Maharashtra & Anr. Case no.: Writ Petition No. 2319 of 2024 Decision on: April 5th, 2024 Quoram: Chief Justice Deve

Bombay High court passes judgement through video conference, considering petitioner’s unique circumstance.
Bombay High court passes judgement through video conference, considering petitioner’s unique circumstance.
January 9, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title: Ashwini Kumar Sharma Mansotra vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr  Case No: WP ST. NO. 134 OF 2024 Decided on: 08.01.2024 CORAM: Hon’ble

In a case where the offence is charged in both POCSO and SCST Act, The jurisdiction to try the offence lie with POCSO : Bombay HC
December 20, 2023by Primelegal Team

TITLE : Aniket v State of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble justice Mangesh S Patil, Hon’ble Justice Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi and Hon’ble Justice

Bombay HC held appeal not maintainable because it did not fulfill the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act
December 16, 2023by Primelegal Team

TITLE : Bank of India V Maruti Civil Works CITATION : Appeal Form Order No. 362 of 2021 CORAM : Hon’ble chief justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya An

Complaint Seeking An Action Under Sub-Section (3) Of Section 156 Of Cr.P.C., The Learned Magistrate Cannot Act Mechanically: High Court of Bombay
December 6, 2023by Primelegal Team

Title : Satish Panchariya v The State of Maharashtra Citation : WP-1009-2012 Decided On: 4th November, 2023. Coram: Justice A. S. Gadkari And Justi

Termination of a workman cannot be done without proper evidence : Bombay HC upholds the decision of Labour Court
December 1, 2023by Primelegal Team

TITLE : Emerson Climate Technologies v Shirish Ramchandra Pawar CITATION : Writ petition no 12995 of 2015 CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Milind N. Jadha

Condition to construct a house within a year of allotment under the Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act  is unreasonable and arbitrary under Article 14 : HC of Bombay
Condition to construct a house within a year of allotment under the Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act is unreasonable and arbitrary under Article 14 : HC of Bombay
November 2, 2023by Primelegal Team

Citation :  Writ Petition No. 4022 of 2021 Coram : Justice G. S. Kulkarni, Justice Jitendra Jain Order date : 30th October, 2023 Introduction : Th