Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Bombay High court passes judgement through video conference, considering petitioner’s unique circumstance.
Bombay High court passes judgement through video conference, considering petitioner’s unique circumstance.
January 9, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Ashwini Kumar Sharma Mansotra vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr  Case No: WP ST. NO. 134 OF 2024 Decided on: 08.01.2024 CORAM: Hon’ble

In a case where the offence is charged in both POCSO and SCST Act, The jurisdiction to try the offence lie with POCSO : Bombay HC
December 20, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Aniket v State of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble justice Mangesh S Patil, Hon’ble Justice Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi and Hon’ble Justice

Bombay HC held appeal not maintainable because it did not fulfill the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act
December 16, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Bank of India V Maruti Civil Works CITATION : Appeal Form Order No. 362 of 2021 CORAM : Hon’ble chief justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya An

Complaint Seeking An Action Under Sub-Section (3) Of Section 156 Of Cr.P.C., The Learned Magistrate Cannot Act Mechanically: High Court of Bombay
December 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title : Satish Panchariya v The State of Maharashtra Citation : WP-1009-2012 Decided On: 4th November, 2023. Coram: Justice A. S. Gadkari And Justi

Termination of a workman cannot be done without proper evidence : Bombay HC upholds the decision of Labour Court
December 1, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Emerson Climate Technologies v Shirish Ramchandra Pawar CITATION : Writ petition no 12995 of 2015 CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Milind N. Jadha

Condition to construct a house within a year of allotment under the Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act  is unreasonable and arbitrary under Article 14 : HC of Bombay
Condition to construct a house within a year of allotment under the Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act is unreasonable and arbitrary under Article 14 : HC of Bombay
November 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Citation :  Writ Petition No. 4022 of 2021 Coram : Justice G. S. Kulkarni, Justice Jitendra Jain Order date : 30th October, 2023 Introduction : Th

Bombay High Court’s Landmark Wynk vs. Tips Judgment: A Game-Changer for Digital Music Platforms
Bombay High Court’s Landmark Wynk vs. Tips Judgment: A Game-Changer for Digital Music Platforms
October 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Wynk Ltd v. Tips Industries Ltd CORAM : G.S.Patel & Gauri Godse, JJ  Decided on: 20th October 2022 Introduction The Bombay High Court ruled do

The Bombay High Court at Goa grants bail to two accused convicted of kidnapping, based on the grounds of prolonged trial, lack of criminal precedents and no flight risk.
The Bombay High Court at Goa grants bail to two accused convicted of kidnapping, based on the grounds of prolonged trial, lack of criminal precedents and no flight risk.
September 5, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Bombay High Court at Goa grants bail to two accused convicted of kidnapping, based on the grounds of prolonged trial, lack of criminal preceden

The Bombay High Court at Goa grants bail to accused charged with raping a minor girl on grounds of recent statements of the victim and her mother taken under Sec 164 CrPC
The Bombay High Court at Goa grants bail to accused charged with raping a minor girl on grounds of recent statements of the victim and her mother taken under Sec 164 CrPC
September 4, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Bombay High Court at Goa grants bail to accused charged with raping a minor girl on grounds of recent statements of the victim and her mother t

The Bombay High Court at Goa upholds a writ petition after its maintainability was challenged by an order from the trial court owing to delay in filing of written statement.
The Bombay High Court at Goa upholds a writ petition after its maintainability was challenged by an order from the trial court owing to delay in filing of written statement.
September 4, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Bombay High Court at Goa upholds a writ petition after its maintainability was challenged by an order from the trial court owing to delay in fi