Supreme Court’s Ruling on Matrimonial Disputes and Maintenance
Case Name: Sau. Jiya vs. Kuldeep Case Number: Civil Appeal No. @ SLP (C) No. 24893 of 2018 Date: January 31, 2025 Quorum: Justice Vikram Nath, Just
SC RULED- APPROPRIATE SELECTION OF LEGAL AVENUE TO APPROACH A COURT
INTRODUCTION: This judgment is pronounced by the supreme court of India in the case of Vimal babu Dhumadiya v state of Maharashtra, it held that
REFUSING TO MARRY IS INDIVIAULS PERSONNEL CHOICE NOT AMOUNTS TO ABETMENT OF SUICIDE
INTRODUCTION: The Nagpur bench of the Bombay high court addressed the issue whether refusal to marriage amounts to abetment of suicide under sectio
NEET-UG 2024: Supreme Court Halts High Court Proceedings on Paper Leak Allegations; While Stating that Counselling will not stop.
An interesting development has come up in the cases dealing in the alleged NEET-UG 2024 paper leak, where the Supreme Court on Thursday (20th July)
Minor’s Aunt Challenges Pune Police in High Court Over Detention in Porsche Crash Case
Update – In the Pune Porsche car crash case, a paternal aunt of the minor accused has petitioned the Bombay High Court, alleged the illegality of
Mere newspaper cuttings does not amount to proof of sharing commercial expertise: Bombay HC upholds Tribunal’s decision.
CASE TITLE – Hindustan Export & Import Corporation Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax CASE NUMBER – Income Tax
Secured Creditors have priority over Tax Authorities under CERSAI : High Court of Bombay
Case Title : Purushottam Prabhakar Chavan v Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax(GST) Case no : Writ Petition No. 3477 of 2024Purushottam Prabhakar C
“The Bombay High Court affirmed the Labour Court’s ruling, upholding the reinstatement of an absent employee with back wages and compensation.”
Case Title: Bhushan Industries v. Lohasingh Ramavadh Yadav Case No.: WRIT PETITION NO. 1025 OF 2024 Date: March 20, 2024 Quorum: Justice Sand
Appellate Court Upholds Determination of Coparcener Rights in Ancestral Property Dispute: Bombay HC
Title: Sau. Ushabai Vs Smt. Mainabai and ORS. Citation: SECOND APPEAL NO. 326/2015 Coram: Justice SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR Date: 22/12/23 Facts The case
The Bombay HC uphelds the decision of the tribunal in reducing the penalty for multiple funds to Jaipur IPL to 15 crores from 98 crores
TITLE : The special director V Jaipur IPL Cricket Pvt. Ltd CORAM : Hon’ble Justice K.R Shriram and Hon’ble Justice Dr. Neela Gokhale DATE : 1
