Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Refund under Section 38(3) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act,2004 is mandatory: Supreme court while upholding the decision of high court

CASE TITTLE: COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES. V.  FEMC PRATIBHA JOINT VENTURE CASE NO: Civil Appeal no. 3940 of 2024 ORDER ON: May 01, 2024 QUORUM

Power to modify the Orders of the original authority conferred to the appellant tribunal cannot be in dispute: Madras High court

CASE TITTLE: Regional PF Commissioner, EPF organization vs President officer EPF Appellate tribunal and ors. CASE NO:W.A(MD).No.298 of 2024 ORDER O

Karnataka HC upholds that accidental fall from train entitles to receive compensation from the railway tribunals even if that falls within the ambit of “self-infliction”‘.
April 26, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Rojamani (since deceased represented by LRs) and Union Bank of India. Case no: M.F.A. NO.3651/2016 (RCT) Dated on: 19thApril, 2024 Quor

Karnataka HC upholds that signing Jaya Bharata Jananiya Tanujate the State anthem in a particular tune will not infringe the fundamental right guaranteed under Art.19(1)(a) and (1)(g)
April 26, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Kikkeri Krishna Murthy and the State of Karnataka and Ors. Case no: Writ petition No. 19801 of 2022 Dated on: 24th April, 2024 Quorum:

Procedures to be followed in cases where protest petition is to be treated as a separate complaint: SC
April 24, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title:-Mukhtar Zaidi V. The State of Uttar Pradesh Case no:- criminal appeal no. of 2024 (arising out of SLP (CRL.) NO.9122 OF 2021) Dated on

When an appealable decree is passed in a suit, no revision should be entered against the order that rejects review on merits: Supreme Court
February 19, 2024by Primelegal Team0

 Case title: Rahimal Bathu Vs Ashiyal Beevi Case no.: SLP (C) No. 8428 OF 2018 Decided on: 26.11.2023 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Pamidighantam Sri

Unscrupulous Litigants Should Not Go Scot-Free: Supreme Court
February 7, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Dinesh Gupta vs The state of Uttarpradesh Case no.: S.L.P.(Crl.) No.3343 of 2022 Decided on: 11.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Vikra

JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE: SUPREME COURT REITERATES THAT LOWER OR SUBORDINATE COURTS DO NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO CONTRADICT THE DECISIONS OF HIGHER COURTS
JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE: SUPREME COURT REITERATES THAT LOWER OR SUBORDINATE COURTS DO NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO CONTRADICT THE DECISIONS OF HIGHER COURTS
January 25, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Mary Pushpam vs Telvi Curusumary Case no.: civil appeal no. 9941 of 2016 Decided on: 03.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Vikram Nath F

Compromise decree would be binding on the party even though if he has not signed on it : Kerala High Court.
Compromise decree would be binding on the party even though if he has not signed on it : Kerala High Court.
January 5, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Ashiya Ummal v. S.N. Sathy & ors. Case No: RSA NO. 247 of 2023 Decided on:  3rd January, 2024 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.

In a case where the offence is charged in both POCSO and SCST Act, The jurisdiction to try the offence lie with POCSO : Bombay HC
December 20, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Aniket v State of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble justice Mangesh S Patil, Hon’ble Justice Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi and Hon’ble Justice

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { var links = document.querySelectorAll('a'); links.forEach(function(link) { if (link.innerHTML.trim() === 'Career' && link.href === 'https://primelegal.in/contact-us/') { link.href = 'https://primelegal.in/career/'; } }); });