Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Section 148 cannot be used without approval of the specified authority, as indicated in Section 151(ii) of the income tax Act: Supreme Court
May 8, 2024by Primelegal Team0

CASE TITLE: ASHOK KUMAR MAKHIJA. V.  UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CASE NO: W.P.(C) 16680/2022 ORDER ON: 07 May 2024 QUORUM:  J. YASHWANT VARMA. V. JUS

CONTINUE READING
Refund under Section 38(3) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act,2004 is mandatory: Supreme court while upholding the decision of high court
May 8, 2024by Primelegal Team0

CASE TITTLE: COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES. V.  FEMC PRATIBHA JOINT VENTURE CASE NO: Civil Appeal no. 3940 of 2024 ORDER ON: May 01, 2024 QUORUM

CONTINUE READING
Power to modify the Orders of the original authority conferred to the appellant tribunal cannot be in dispute: Madras High court
May 8, 2024by Primelegal Team0

CASE TITTLE: Regional PF Commissioner, EPF organization vs President officer EPF Appellate tribunal and ors. CASE NO:W.A(MD).No.298 of 2024 ORDER O

CONTINUE READING
Karnataka HC upholds that accidental fall from train entitles to receive compensation from the railway tribunals even if that falls within the ambit of “self-infliction”‘.
April 26, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Rojamani (since deceased represented by LRs) and Union Bank of India. Case no: M.F.A. NO.3651/2016 (RCT) Dated on: 19thApril, 2024 Quor

CONTINUE READING
Karnataka HC upholds that signing Jaya Bharata Jananiya Tanujate the State anthem in a particular tune will not infringe the fundamental right guaranteed under Art.19(1)(a) and (1)(g)
April 26, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Kikkeri Krishna Murthy and the State of Karnataka and Ors. Case no: Writ petition No. 19801 of 2022 Dated on: 24th April, 2024 Quorum:

CONTINUE READING
Procedures to be followed in cases where protest petition is to be treated as a separate complaint: SC
April 24, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title:-Mukhtar Zaidi V. The State of Uttar Pradesh Case no:- criminal appeal no. of 2024 (arising out of SLP (CRL.) NO.9122 OF 2021) Dated on

CONTINUE READING
When an appealable decree is passed in a suit, no revision should be entered against the order that rejects review on merits: Supreme Court
February 19, 2024by Primelegal Team0

 Case title: Rahimal Bathu Vs Ashiyal Beevi Case no.: SLP (C) No. 8428 OF 2018 Decided on: 26.11.2023 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Pamidighantam Sri

CONTINUE READING
Unscrupulous Litigants Should Not Go Scot-Free: Supreme Court
February 7, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Dinesh Gupta vs The state of Uttarpradesh Case no.: S.L.P.(Crl.) No.3343 of 2022 Decided on: 11.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Vikra

CONTINUE READING
JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE: SUPREME COURT REITERATES THAT LOWER OR SUBORDINATE COURTS DO NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO CONTRADICT THE DECISIONS OF HIGHER COURTS
JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE: SUPREME COURT REITERATES THAT LOWER OR SUBORDINATE COURTS DO NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO CONTRADICT THE DECISIONS OF HIGHER COURTS
January 25, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Mary Pushpam vs Telvi Curusumary Case no.: civil appeal no. 9941 of 2016 Decided on: 03.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Vikram Nath F

CONTINUE READING
Compromise decree would be binding on the party even though if he has not signed on it : Kerala High Court.
Compromise decree would be binding on the party even though if he has not signed on it : Kerala High Court.
January 5, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Ashiya Ummal v. S.N. Sathy & ors. Case No: RSA NO. 247 of 2023 Decided on:  3rd January, 2024 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.