Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Supreme Court: Even if the plea of limitation is Not set up as a defence, the Court has to dismiss the suit if it is Barred by limitation.

CASE TITTLE:S. SHIVRAJ REDDY(DIED)THR HIS LRS. AND Anr V S. RAGHURAJ REDDY AND OTHERS CASE NO: CIVIL APPEAL OF 2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s)

Impleading the appellant as a legal representative would change the nature of the suit:Delhi High Court.

CASE TITTLE:K JEEVAN RITA MURTHY .V. SARABJIT SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) & ANR. CASE NO: FAO(OS) 67/2024 & C.M.Nos.27890-27894/2024 ORDER ON:10

Supreme court rulings: No subsequent pleading to the Written statement of a defendant can be presented except by the Leave of the Court.

CASE TITTLE: SHEIKH NOORUL HASSAN V NAHAKPAM INDRAJIT SINGH & ORS CASE NO:CIVIL APPEAL N0. 1389 OF 2024 ORDER ON: May 8, 2024 QUORUM: J.D.Y. Ch

Bombay High Court rules in police recruitment advertisement: Dismissal of multiple applications by numerous candidates for judicial review

CASE TITLE: Ashok Mallinath Halsangi. V. The State of Maharashtra and ors CASE NO: WRIT PETITION NO. 7650 OF 2023 ORDER ON:03-05-2024 QUORUM: J. JI

Section 148 cannot be used without approval of the specified authority, as indicated in Section 151(ii) of the income tax Act: Supreme Court

CASE TITLE: ASHOK KUMAR MAKHIJA. V.  UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CASE NO: W.P.(C) 16680/2022 ORDER ON: 07 May 2024 QUORUM:  J. YASHWANT VARMA. V. JUS

Refund under Section 38(3) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act,2004 is mandatory: Supreme court while upholding the decision of high court

CASE TITTLE: COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES. V.  FEMC PRATIBHA JOINT VENTURE CASE NO: Civil Appeal no. 3940 of 2024 ORDER ON: May 01, 2024 QUORUM

Power to modify the Orders of the original authority conferred to the appellant tribunal cannot be in dispute: Madras High court

CASE TITTLE: Regional PF Commissioner, EPF organization vs President officer EPF Appellate tribunal and ors. CASE NO:W.A(MD).No.298 of 2024 ORDER O

Karnataka HC upholds that accidental fall from train entitles to receive compensation from the railway tribunals even if that falls within the ambit of “self-infliction”‘.
April 26, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Rojamani (since deceased represented by LRs) and Union Bank of India. Case no: M.F.A. NO.3651/2016 (RCT) Dated on: 19thApril, 2024 Quor

Karnataka HC upholds that signing Jaya Bharata Jananiya Tanujate the State anthem in a particular tune will not infringe the fundamental right guaranteed under Art.19(1)(a) and (1)(g)
April 26, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Kikkeri Krishna Murthy and the State of Karnataka and Ors. Case no: Writ petition No. 19801 of 2022 Dated on: 24th April, 2024 Quorum:

Procedures to be followed in cases where protest petition is to be treated as a separate complaint: SC
April 24, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title:-Mukhtar Zaidi V. The State of Uttar Pradesh Case no:- criminal appeal no. of 2024 (arising out of SLP (CRL.) NO.9122 OF 2021) Dated on