Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Accused can be convicted for rape solely on testimony of prosecutrix if it is trustworthy and corroborated by evidence: High Court of Orissa
July 23, 2021by Primelegal Team

The testimony of a victim of sex offence is entitled to great weight before the court and therefore the accused person can be convicted for rape so

A person who did not deposit the amount given in the coordinate bench’s order is not entitled to more indulgence from this court: High Court of Uttarakhand
A person who did not deposit the amount given in the coordinate bench’s order is not entitled to more indulgence from this court: High Court of Uttarakhand
July 23, 2021by Primelegal Team

A person who has not made any progress in complying with an order passed by the coordinate bench of a High Court, cannot expect much more indulgenc

Refund of entire court fees, when the dispute between parties stands amicably settled through mediation: High Court of Delhi.
July 23, 2021by Primelegal Team

As per section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the dispute between two parties is settled amicably through mediation before the commencement of

Successor shall be entitled to hold the service land of the holder: Chhattisgarh High Court
July 23, 2021by Primelegal Team

Provision of Section 183 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959  does not grant the proprietary right to a Kotwar in any manner and there is

Dispute between parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC successfully resolved by way of Mediation and Conciliation: The High Court of Delhi
July 23, 2021by Primelegal Team

Fraudulent representations made by the respondents to secure investments from the petitioner company, which were further misappropriated and siphon

Non-­mentioning  of the probation period in their appointment orders cannot deprive from benefits to which they are otherwise entitled: Chhattisgarh High court
July 23, 2021by Primelegal Team

In the present case, the question of law and fact is the same in all these writs and hence they were clubbed together. The petitioners in the prese

Petitioner charged for offences punishable under Sections 328, 389 and 34 IPC, granted bail: The High Court of Delhi
July 23, 2021by Primelegal Team

Just because the complainant is alleging that he is getting threatening calls, it will not be appropriate to keep the accused in custody and the Co

Mere complaints of threatening call, is not an appropriate reason to keep the accused in custody: High Court of Delhi.
July 23, 2021by Primelegal Team

When there is no substantial reason to detain the accused in custody, against whom a complaint had been registered, then such accused can be grante

No person shall drive a motor vehicle in any public place unless he holds an effective driving licence issued to him authorising him to drive the vehicle.: High court of Punjab and Haryana
July 22, 2021by Primelegal Team

The petitioner was convicted under section 279 Indian Penal Code, i.e. “Rash driving or riding on a public way. i.e., Whoever drives any vehicle,

Petitioner denied to seek refund of excess advance tax on the grounds of it being a stale claim: The High Court of Delhi
July 22, 2021by Primelegal Team

It is settled law that representations made by the Petitioner would not extend the period of limitation. The aforesaid law has also been relied upo