Case Name: Rekha Sharad Ushir vs. Saptashrungi Mahila Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. & Ors.
Case Number: Civil Appeal No. 1421 of 2025
Date: March 21, 2025
Quorum: Justice Abhay S. Oka, Justice Rajesh Bindal
FACTS OF THE CASE
Rekha Sharad Ushir who is the said appellant , was a shareholder and was also a member of Saptashrungi Mahila Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. She by filing the said suit had further challenged the decision of the respondent bank, which removed her from membership, by citing non-compliance with the banking and cooperative society regulations which were to be followed. The dispute in the said case arose when the bank issued notices regarding her alleged ineligibility. The matter further escalated when the Registrar of Cooperative Societies upheld the bank’s decision. Aggrieved by this, the appellant approached the High Court, which dismissed her plea. She then appealed to the Supreme Court to challenge her removal from membership and the legality of the bank’s actions.
ISSUES
- Whether the removal of the appellant from the membership of the cooperative bank was legally justified.
- Whether due process was followed by the bank in removing the appellant from its membership.
- Whether the Registrar of Cooperative Societies had the authority to validate such a removal.
LEGAL PROVISIONS
- Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 – Governs the functioning and membership rules of cooperative societies in Maharashtra.
- Banking Regulation Act, 1949 – Lays down guidelines for cooperative banks in India.
- Principles of Natural Justice – Ensures that no person is condemned unheard and that fair procedures are followed.
ARGUMENTS
Petitioner’s Arguments:
- No prior opportunity for explanation was provided before her removal.
- The Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act mandates a fair hearing before any such action.
- The Registrar of Cooperative Societies wrongly upheld an illegal decision.
Respondent’s Arguments:
- The appellant failed to meet membership criteria as per banking and cooperative society laws.
- Multiple notices were served to the appellant before her removal.
- The High Court correctly upheld the Registrar’s decision as per statutory provisions.
- The decision was necessary to maintain the financial integrity of the cooperative bank.
ANALYSIS
The Supreme Court analyzed whether the appellant’s removal adhered to legal standards. It was noted that while cooperative societies have the autonomy to manage memberships, they must adhere to statutory procedures. The Court observe that the appellant was not given a sufficient opportunity to present her case before the removal, violating the principles of natural justice. While the Registrar has oversight, its decision must align with legal requirements, which were not fully met in this case. The bank’s argument regarding financial integrity was valid, but procedural lapses weakened its stance.
JUDGEMENT
- The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s decision.
- It ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the bank to reinstate her membership.
- The Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to fair procedures in cooperative societies.
- The Registrar of Cooperative Societies was advised to reassess similar cases with greater scrutiny..
CONCLUSION
This ruling reinforces the importance of due process in cooperative societies. It establishes that cooperative banks must adhere to fair procedures while ensuring compliance with banking laws. The decision also highlights the significance of principles of natural justice in protecting membership rights within cooperative institutions.
“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal falls into the category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer
lawyer, best civil lawyer.”
WRITTEN BY POOJA PARAMESWARAN
