Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
If substance of complaint fulfills section 141 of NI Act,the complainant can proceed in accordance with law: Delhi High court

CASE TITTLE: SHIKHA SHAH V RENU PROMOTERS PVT LTD CASE NO: CRL.M.C. 456/2022 & CRL.M.A. 2059/2022 ORDER ON: 29.02.2024 QUORUM: . JUSTICE NAVIN

Grant of recovery rights as against the registered owner of the offending vehicle, cannot be sustained in law:Delhi High Court

CASE TITTLE: SANDEEP YADAV. versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. CASE NO: MAC.APP. 39/2022& CM APPL. 7486/2022 ORDER ON: 20 May 2024 QUORUM: . J

Delhi High Court Rullings:‘other liability’ encompasses all distinct forms of liabilities but not limited to the liability undertaken as a guarantor.

CASE TITTLE: MRS SANTOSH RANI DHARIWAL V STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR CASE NO: CRL.M.C. 6017/2023 & CRL.M.A. 22555/2023 ORDER ON: 28.0

Karnataka High Court: Directorate of Civil Rights Enforcement to the District Caste Verification committee,vests power to Cancellation of caste certificate, Tahsildar only implements the direction of the Committee.

CASE TITTLE: B. GURUPRASAD V ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER and Anr CASE NO: WRIT PETITION No.8039 OF 2021 ORDER ON: :28.05.2024 QUORUM: JUSTICE M. NAGAPRA

The provisions of DVAT Act with regard to grant of interest would be applicable to the case of the petitioner: Delhi High Court.
The provisions of DVAT Act with regard to grant of interest would be applicable to the case of the petitioner: Delhi High Court.

CASE TITTLE: RASHTRIYA TRANSPORT CORPORATION V COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX & ANR. CASE NO: W.P.(C) 11463/2023 ORDER ON: : 27 Ma

Solely on the basis of allegations bail cannot be resisted, High Court of Karnataka while viewing the bail petition

CASE TITTLE: MADHUNIRANJAN SWAMY M. S. V STATE OF KARNATAKA CASE NO: CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4300 OF 2024 DATED ON: 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2024 QUORUM: JUS

Patna High Court: Acquits Convicts in 2011 Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Witness Credibility

Patna High Court: Acquits Convicts in 2011 Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Witness Credibility Case title:  Rajendra Yadav VS The State of

The High Court of Karnataka, while granting bail ruled that,the allegations against the petitioner are not sufficient to resist bail

CASE TITTLE: MADHUNIRANJAN SWAMY M. S. V STATE OF KARNATAKA CASE NO: CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4300 OF 2024 DATED ON: 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2024 QUORUM: JUS

Karnataka High Court, orders granting of bail with the intension to re-establish their matrimonial life.

CASE TITTLE: HANISH ABDUL KHADAR V STATE OF KARNATAKA, SHILPA CASE NO: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 582 OF 2024 (U/S 14(A) (2) DATED ON: 21ST DAY OF MAY, 20

Order 24 of Board of Revenue Standing Orders, Revenue Department, could never be invoked for resumption of land on account of non-utilization of the portion of the land in question: High Court of Andra Pradesh.

CASE TITTLE: M/s. Sweekaar Rehabilitation Institute for Handicapped, Secunderabad v The State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department CASE NO: WRIT A

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { var links = document.querySelectorAll('a'); links.forEach(function(link) { if (link.innerHTML.trim() === 'Career' && link.href === 'https://primelegal.in/contact-us/') { link.href = 'https://primelegal.in/career/'; } }); });