Case Name: Court on its own motion v. State Case Number: CRL.REF. 2/2022 Court: High Court of Delhi Date of Judgement: 29th October 2025 Bench/ Quo
Case Name: Court on its own motion v. State Case Number: CRL.REF. 2/2022 Court: High Court of Delhi Date of Judgement: 29th October 2025 Bench/ Quo
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The case revolves around judiciary’s role in ensuring fair and safe trial proceeding, wherein the Delhi High Court a
Introduction Dr. Sivaranjani Santosh saw what she described as a people’s victory on October 14, 2025, following eight years of advocacy. The
Facts Mars Incorporated, the plaintiff and Cadbury India Ltd, which is now part of the Mondelez Group, the defendants were engaged in a long legal
FACTS In this case, Axis Bank sanctioned a credit facility of Rs. 16.68 crore to Sundev Appliances Ltd. (Respondent no. 3). The loan was secured by
Introduction The Delhi High Court noted that the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Tribunal operates differently from a regular civil court in a not
Introduction The Delhi High Court noted that the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Tribunal operates differently from a regular civil court in a not
Introduction When a person invents something that has never before been invented by anyone, the first thing he would seek is protection legally a
FACTS The Government of India executed a Production Sharing Contract (PSC) with MIEL (Petitioner in this case), GAIL, the Respondent, and others. T
Introduction The Delhi High Court recently granted an injunction to restrain the Defendant from using the ‘BARBIE’ trademark for their busine