Accused cannot be arrested soon after the registration of an FIR: Punjab & Haryana High Court
When a complaint discloses the commission of a cognizable offence while filing an FIR, the arrest cannot be merely done through registration of an
The Court is inclined to allow the prayer for pre-arrest bail as there is no direct evidence as to prove the offence by the petitioners: High court of Patna
The petitioner was taken into custody under Section 498A IPC, “Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty”, section 50
“Respondent will face jail time if he does not deposit the said amount”: Supreme Court, Part 2.
In the proceedings dated 09.08.2021, learned counsel submitted on behalf of the appellant that he was willing to pay compensation of Rs.3.00 lakhs
“Respondent will face jail time if he does not deposit the said amount”: Supreme Court, Part 1.
In context of the Criminal Appeal No .894 Of 2021, Samaul Sk. vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr., Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul passed the judgment
Sharing or forwarding of defamatory material without any verification and without asking the authorities prior in time to investigate the authenticity of the same amounts to defamation : Delhi High Court
Any material that could be potentially defamatory, cannot be shared or forwarded carelessly especially in this modern day and age of internet. This
The Railways are liable to pay compensation if the delay of Trains is not explained or justified: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court ruled that the railways would be liable for compensation unless they provided proof and explained why a train arrived late, estab
A Director of Enforcement Can Be Appointed For More Than Two Years: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court ruled that by following the procedure outlined in Section 25 of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, a Director of Enforce
No person in the eyes of law can escape from rigorous imprisonment after violating Section 392 IPC: New Delhi High Court.
The default was suppose to undergo simple Imprisonment for a period of one month, this was held in the judgement passed by a single bench judge com
Trial u/S 138 NI Act-Signatures on cheque not disputed-Cheque to be taken as validly drawn-The fact that the body of the cheque was not filled up by accused himself-is no defence in itself: Punjab and Haryana High Court
It appeared that the power under Section 482 Crpc cannot be exercised by this Court to re-appreciate the same material, which was available before
Suit in the name of assumed business name of proprietary concern – maintainable: Punjab and Haryana High Court
It appeared that the in case of a proprietary firm if the relationship between the firm and the proprietor is clear and not in dispute then it does
