Primelegal Team, Author at Prime Legal Law Firm

Sarpanch accused of embezzlement granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.: High Court of Punjab and Haryana

The petitioner was arrested on the 23rd November 2018 under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, “Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of

Disputes on interpretation and terms of contracts, not a subject matter of writ proceedings: High Court Of Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh

Certain facts which had emerged from the pleadings of the parties and are required to be noticed were that the petitioner was awarded two purchase

Sec. 164-A Cr.P.C. can be assessed and evaluated by Trial Court during framing of charges: High Court Of Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh

The Petitioners had sought quashing of the criminal proceedings, initiated against them on the basis of the challan laid before the trial court. Th

Report of Forensic Science Laboratory proves whether the accused is guilty of dowry death: High Court of Punjab and Haryana

The petitioner apprehended arrest under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, “Dowry death where the death of a woman is caused by any bodily i

Dying Declaration will help in convicting the appellants: High Court Of Calcutta

The Dying Declaration which was made by the dead person gave a lot of confusion in the present case and this was held in the judgement passed by a

Circumstantial Evidence without the presence of motive is not enough to convict the accused: Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court quashed the order of the High Court and upheld the judgement given by the session’s court concerning inconsistency in the flow of e

Affair not discharging the promise of marriage cannot be held as misrepresentation: Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court acquitted the accused in the matter concerning whether failure to marry proves that the appellant never intended to marry and had fra

Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226/227 rendered infructuous: High Court of Punjab and Haryana

The petitioner was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, in FIR No.240 on the 20th of July 2017 under Sections 376(2)

Mandamus was not issued as the demarcation report is under challenge before this Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana

The petitioner-bank (Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd) filed a civil writ petition to issue a writ of Mandamus under article 226 of the constitution of Indi

Ex-parte order without the knowledge of Corporate Debtor not sustainable: NCLAT (New Delhi)

The Adjudicating Authority shall reject the application so filed if the Operational Creditor has received a notice of a dispute from the Corporate

Blogs And Articles