PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Khyali Ram
Vs.
State of Punjab
Date of decision: 16.08.2023
CRM M- 39814 of 2023
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajbir Sehrawat
FACT:
The current plea has been lodged under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking anticipatory or pre-arrest bail for the petitioner in relation to FIR No. 147 dated 29.09.2022. This FIR was filed under Sections 295 and 295-A of the Indian Penal Code at Rajasansi Police Station in Amritsar (see Annexure P1). The petitioner’s attorney argues that the charges against the petitioner are entirely baseless and fabricated. According to the petitioner, they are not connected to the alleged crime. Even if we consider the prosecution’s claims, the petitioner supposedly made some disrespectful remarks about Maharishi Valmiki during a press conference. However, while the petitioner did address members of the media, their words were intended to highlight the admirable qualities and presence of Maharishi Valmiki, rather than to diminish his stature.
COURT ANALYSIS AND DECISION:
The State’s lawyer, following guidance from ASI Subhash Chander, has conveyed that the police were informed about the petitioner’s alleged attempt to offend the religious sentiments of a specific community. This is why the mentioned FIR was appropriately filed against the petitioner. Nonetheless, it was acknowledged that there are no other charges against the petitioner, and the mentioned statements were made within the boundaries of the state of Rajasthan. Considering the aforementioned details, and refraining from making any judgments on the case’s merits, the current petition was granted.
“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”
Written by- Srijan Garg
khyali-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-crm-m-39814-2023-punjab-and-haryana-high-court-486994