PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA
V.
STATE OF PUNJAB
2023:PHHC:086614
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara
FACTS:
According to the available information, an inquiry was conducted during which the petitioner failed to provide concrete evidence regarding the alleged threats from the Khalistan Liberation Force. The inquiry specifically mentioned that the petitioner’s intention for seeking security appeared to be related to his reputation in society. It is important to note that the dispute in question concerns the possession of a flat, but the petitioner is not seeking protection in that context, and therefore, that aspect is not being considered in this case. Although the petitioner has attached a threat letter, the court or authorities cannot grant indefinite protection based solely on that letter. The petitioner is expected to take appropriate measures to ensure their safety. Moreover, the State authorities did not find sufficient corroboration or supporting evidence related to the mentioned threat letter, and as a result, the petitioner cannot seek endless or perpetual protection solely on the basis of that letter. The petitioner needs to substantiate the threats with credible evidence to warrant further protective measures.
COURT ANALYSIS AND DECISION:
Based on the entirety of the facts and circumstances, it has been clarified that if the petitioner genuinely feels a threat to his life, he may approach the relevant Superintendent of Police. The Superintendent of Police will then provide him with security on a day-to-day basis. However, it is essential for the petitioner to fully cooperate during such a threat perception and avoid attending public functions, weddings, parties, or unnecessarily roaming in areas that could jeopardize his safety. The order further specifies that if the petitioner fails to comply with the condition of not visiting the mentioned places, the security provided shall be withdrawn immediately. The provided security shall remain in effect for a duration of 30 days. If the threat perception persists beyond this period, the petitioner can file a representation with the concerned Superintendent of Police. If still aggrieved, the petitioner is free to approach the Court again for further consideration of his case.
“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”
Written by- Srijan Garg
