Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
91478632 (1)
Inder Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh – Legal Battle Over Time and Title.
March 25, 2025by Primelegal Team0

Case Name: Inder Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Case Number: Civil Appeal No. (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 6145 of 2024) Date: March 21, 2025

divorce
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA REJECTS EXTRADITION IN MARRIAGE DISPUTE, ASKS TO USE DIPLOMATIC CHANNELS.
February 26, 2025by Primelegal Team0

INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India has recently turned down a magistrate’s order which directed the extradition of a US-based husband wh

TERRR
WOMEN CAN RECEIVE ALIMONY AND MAINTENANCE WHEN MISLED TO AN INVALID MARRIAGE
February 19, 2025by Primelegal Team0

INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India has confirmed that women in invalid or void marriages have the right to alimony and maintenance according t

ai
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AN EMERGNCE FIELD IN COPYRIGHT LAW: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL CONCERN
February 19, 2025by Primelegal Team0

ABSTRACT The rapidly growth of Artificial Intelligence in the area of medical science, transportation, aviation, space, education, entertainment an

images (1)
“JUDICIAL SCRUTINY IN PUBLIC APPONTMENTS: THE LEGALITY OF LEADERSHIP AND EXPERIENCE IN THE SELECTION OF CHARIMAN OF NCH”
February 19, 2025by Primelegal Team0

Case Name: Dr. Amaragouda Patil vs Union of India & Ors Case Number: Civil Appeal NOS.301–303 OF 2025 Date: February 12, 2025 Quorum:  NS Sa

Screenshot 2025-02-19 135152
JUDGEMENT REVIEW : SUPREME COURT ASKS FOR STRICTER BAIL PROCESS IN PMLA CASE
February 19, 2025by Primelegal Team0

Case Name: The Union of India Through The Assistant Director vs. Kanhaiya Prasad Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: 2025 INSC 210 Bench: Justi

images (1)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. PRISM CEMENT LTD.: SC UPHOLDS TAX EXEMPTIONS AGAINST RETROSPECTIVE POLICY CHANGES
February 19, 2025by Primelegal Team0

Case Details: Case Name:- The State of Maharashtra & Ors. vs. Prism Cement Limited  Case Number:- Civil Appeal No. 13928 of 2015 Date: 12/02/2

Screenshot_20200629-201321_2.original-768x432
JUDGEMENT REVIEW : COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT IS A MATTER OF POLICY AND CANNOT BE DECIDED BY COURTS
February 17, 2025by Primelegal Team0

Case Name: Canara Bank vs. Ajithkumar G. Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: 2025 INSC 184 Bench: Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Prashant K

1111
The Balance between Procedural Diligence and Substantive Justice from Abatement to Restoration
February 17, 2025by Primelegal Team0

Name of the case: Om Prakash Gupta Alias Lalloowa(now deceased) Vs. Satish Chandra(now deceased) Number: Civil Appeal No. 13407 of 2024 Date: 11 Fe

Untitled-10
FIR CANNOT BE USED AS SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE IN CASE OF INFORMANT DEATH BEFORE TESTIMONY
February 17, 2025by Primelegal Team0

INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India in a recent ruling has commented that statements recorded in a FIR lose their evidentiary value if the info