#propertylaw Archives - Prime Legal Law Firm Blogs

Karnataka High Court Quashes RERA Circular: Delay Fees on Audit Reports Deemed Ultra Vires

Introduction The Karnataka High Court in a recent judgement Sharada Achar v. State of Karnataka & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 316, quashed a circul

Rajasthan HC Clarifies Distinction Between Private and Public Temples.

FACTS OF THE CASE Aayush Narania, Proprietor M/s Bharat Meat Shop, Mohammad Ashraf Qureshi, Proprietor M/s Mohammad Meat Shop and Mohammad Wasim,

Supreme Court Upholds Owner’s Preferential Right in Slum Rehabilitation; Bars Land Acquisition without Due Extinguishment

Introduction The Supreme Court of India has made a ground-breaking judgment that landowners possess a preferential right to redevelop slum-a

Landmark Supreme Court Ruling Upholds Fair Partition in Property Dispute

Case Title – Srinivas Raghavendrarao Desai (Dead) by Lrs. vs V. Kumar Vamanrao @ Alok and Ors. Case No. – Civil Appeal No(S). 7293-7294 of 2010

An Analysis of the Realm of the Human Body through the Laws of Poperty

ABSTRACT This article explores the concept of human body rights throughout history and in the current legal system. It argues that the human body i

“Supreme Court Rules Out Easement by Necessity in Presence of Alternative Property Access”

Case title: Manisha Mahendra Gala & Ors. V. Shalini Bhagwan Avatramani & Ors. Case no.: Civil Appeal No. 9643 Of 2010 Dated on: 10th April

Additional compensation would not be granted in cases where the limitation period has barred and when an alternative remedy is available – Bombay HC

TITLE : Sardar v The state of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Ravindra v Ghuge DATE : 15th January 2024 CITATION : WP No. 14842 Of 2023 F

Bombay HC calls demolition notice against the legal system, sets aside notice against shiv Sena member

TITLE : Sadanand Gangaram Kadam V Additional Commissioner, Konkan Bhavan and Ors CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Milind N. Jadhav DATE : 6th January 20

The supreme court sets aside the order of Madurai bench on property consideration not being paid; States Time would be the essence of the contract.

TITLE : Alagammal and Ors v Ganesan and Anr CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Hon’ble Justice Vikram Nath DATE : 10th Janu

Bombay HC dismisses the order set by appellate authority as the same person rejected the developer’s application for reconstruction

TITLE : S.K Realty v State of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Milind N Jadhav DATE : 2nd January 2024 CITATION : WP No 13458 of 2023 FACTS

Blogs And Articles