Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
: MP High Court" headline="" subheadline="<span class="btArticleDate">April 30, 2024</span><span class="btArticleAuthor"><a href="https://blog.primelegal.in/author/anik/" class="btArticleAuthorURL">by Primelegal Team</a></span><a href="https://blog.primelegal.in/employees-satisfaction-with-wages-not-absolute-doesnt-preclude-them-from-claiming-higher-wages-majithia-wage-board-recommendations-mp-high-court/#comments" class="btArticleComments">0</a>" font="" font_weight="" font_size="" color_scheme="" color="" align="" url="https://blog.primelegal.in/employees-satisfaction-with-wages-not-absolute-doesnt-preclude-them-from-claiming-higher-wages-majithia-wage-board-recommendations-mp-high-court/" target="_self" html_tag="h2" size="normal" dash="" el_id="" el_class="" el_style="" supertitle_position="outside" ignore_fe_editor="true"]

Case title: Dainik Bhaskar v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Case no.: Misc. Petition No. 5093 Of 2022 Order on: 22nd April 2024 Quorum: Justice G.S.

Delhi High court rejected the Review petition filed by Statesman Limited seeks to review the judgement passed by the high court.

Title: The StatesMan Limited vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Decision: 04.07.23 + REVIEW PET. 516/2019 and CM APPL. 53531/2019, CM APPL. 12275/