Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Defence representative for a workman is not permissible under inquiry proceedings : Bombay HC
January 16, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Ajit Bhagwan Sawant V M/s Parveen Industries Pvt Ltd. CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Sandeep V Marne DATE :  8th January 2024 CITATION : WP No.

The Bombay HC quashes industrial court orders with regards to payment of wages
January 16, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : The Maharashtra State Co-operative V Smt. Bhagyashree Pravin Kulkarni CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Sandeep V Marne DATE :  5th  January 2024

A person in managerial position cannot be termed as an workman under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 : Bombay HC
January 3, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Rohit Dembiwal v Tata Consultancy Services Ltd CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Milind N Jadhav DATE :  2nd January 2024 CITATION : WP No 10523 o

Past records of an employee is irrelevant if the misconduct is grave in nature to award compensation : Bombay HC
December 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Wheels India Ltd. V Ganesh Bajirao Vishwasrao CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Sandeep V Marne DATE :  22nd  December, 2023 CITATION : WP No. 99

Employee entitled to compensation although there was misconduct for his long service : Bombay HC on reducing the compensation amount
December 22, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Raptakos Breet & Company Ltd v Gajanan M. Sonawane CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Sandeep V. Marne DATE :  22nd  December, 2023 CITATION :

Not providing labor permanency for 14 workmen is an unfair practice : Bombay HC
December 11, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Solapur Mahanagarpalika v Yogesh Nagnath Mane & Ors CITATION : . CIVIL WP-14150-2023 CORAM : Hon’ble justice Milind N. Jadhav DATE: Â

Termination of a workman cannot be done without proper evidence : Bombay HC upholds the decision of Labour Court
December 1, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Emerson Climate Technologies v Shirish Ramchandra Pawar CITATION : Writ petition no 12995 of 2015 CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Milind N. Jadha

An employee engaged for the same work, cannot be paid less than another, who performs the same duties and responsibilities: Gujarat High Court dismisses appeal
An employee engaged for the same work, cannot be paid less than another, who performs the same duties and responsibilities: Gujarat High Court dismisses appeal

Vice Chancellor vs Amulaben Narendrabhai Nimavat on 17 April, 2023 Bench: Honourable Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8816

ANALYSIS OF A JUDGMENT ON UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICES: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
ANALYSIS OF A JUDGMENT ON UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICES: BOMBAY HIGH COURT

INTRODUCTION: The High Court of Bombay: passed a judgement on 06 June 2023. In the case of THE BHATIYA GENERAL HOSPITAL AND ANR Vs HANMANT ANANDR