HC DIRECTS TRAINING FOR MACT, FLAGS GAPS IN INJURY AND DISABILITY ASSESSMENT
INTRODUCTION: With an awareness of considerable inconsistencies in disability and injury estimations of victims of motor accidents, the High Cour
WOMEN CAN RECEIVE ALIMONY AND MAINTENANCE WHEN MISLED TO AN INVALID MARRIAGE
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India has confirmed that women in invalid or void marriages have the right to alimony and maintenance according t
BNSS vs. CrPC: Supreme Court Emphasizes Magistrate’s Duty to Provide Reasoned FIR Orders
Introduction The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita is a basic turning point on many aberrant procedural laws based on the CrPC of 1973 from July
SC- COMMUTES THE DEATH PENALTY TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT IN MULTIPLE MURDER CASE
INTRODUCTION The supreme court of India has recently delivered a judgment in the case of Deena Dayal Tiwari v state of Uttar Pradesh (2025) which
NO COMMON INTENTION IS ESTABLISHED UNDER SEC 34 IPC – SC RESORTS TRIAL COURT ACQUITTAL
Case name: CONSTABLE 907 SURENDRA SINGH & ANR VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Case number: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 788 OF 2013 Date: 28-01-2025 Quorum:
CAN PROMOTION OVERRIDE THE PROCEDURAL RULES OF RECRUITMENT?
Case Name: Jyostnamayee Mishra v. The State of Odisha & Ors. Case Number: SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.13984 OF 2023 Date of Judgment: J
When Life Calls: Bombay HC Reshapes Parole Eligibility for Emergencies
INTRODUCTION The Bombay High Court recently held that issues like family members’ serious illness, wife’s delivery, natural calamitie
Delhi High Court refuses to entertain PIL seeking school admissions for children of Rohingya refugees
INTRODUCTION The Delhi High Court on Tuesday declined to entertain a plea seeking directions to the Delhi government to grant school admission to c
Regional Faiths Matter: Calcutta HC Reserves Judgment on Kali Puja PIL
INTRODUCTION A Calcutta High Court vacation bench has remarked that since religious practices in East India differ from those in North India, it wo
Aadhar vs. School Records: Supreme Court’s Stand on Proof of Age
CASE NAME: Saroj & Ors. V. IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co. & Ors. CASE NO.: Civil Appeal Nos. (Arising out SLP(C) Nos. 23939-23940 OF 2
