Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
GOVERNMENT BODIES ARE EXPECTED TO ACT IN ABSOLUTELY FAIR, REASONABLE & Instagram
GOVERNMENT BODIES ARE EXPECTED TO ACT IN ABSOLUTELY FAIR, REASONABLE AND TRANSPARENT MANNER, PARTICULARLY IN MATTER OF AWARDING MEGA PROJECTS: SUPREME COURT
October 14, 2024by Primelegal Team0

CASE NAME- BANSHIDHAR CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. Vs. BHARAT COKING COAL     LIMITED & OTHERS  CASE NO.- CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11005 OF 2024  DATE OF

Railway Contract Dispute-GMB
UNJUST TERMINATION & FLAWED ARBITRATION:HOW A RAILWAY CONTRACT DISPUTE EXPOSED LEGAL LOOPHOLES
October 10, 2024by Primelegal Team0

  CASE NAME- UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, EAST COAST RAILWAY, BHUBANESWAR vs. B. B. SENAPATI  CASE NO.- ARBA No.7 of

Supreme Court Affirms Jurisdictional Scope in Contractual Disputes: The Municipal Committee Katra Case
Supreme Court Affirms Jurisdictional Scope in Contractual Disputes: The Municipal Committee Katra Case
June 10, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE KATRA & ORS. Vs. ASHWANI KUMAR Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 14970-71 OF 2017 Dated on: May 09, 2024 Coram: J.

Delhi High Court appointed a substitute Arbitrator on account of abandonment of Arbitration proceedings by the erstwhile Arbitrator
April 15, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: North East Centre of Technology Application and Reach (NECTAR) Vs Divine Bamboo Mat Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Case no.: O.M.P.

Reexamining the notion that time is not the essence of a contract involving immovable property is necessary: Karnataka High Court
March 21, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case No: 406/2007. Facts of the case:- The Plaintiff commenced legal proceedings to enforce the 20.07.2006 sale agreement by specific execution of

A notice to terminate the contract cannot be issued unilaterally by one party without the adjudication of the Court: Jharkhand High Court
March 14, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title – M/s Aditya and Rashmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. VS The State of Jharkhand & Ors Case no. – W.P. (C) No. 2924 of 2014 Decision on

“NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION OVERSTEPPED ITS POWERS AND JURISDICTION”: SUPREME COURT
March 8, 2024by Primelegal Team0

CASE TITLE:  Venkataraman Krishnamurthy and Anr. v. Lodha Crown Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. CASE NO: Civil Appeal No. 971 of 2023 DECIDED ON: 1.03.2024 QU

The supreme court sets aside the order of Madurai bench on property consideration not being paid; States Time would be the essence of the contract.
January 11, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Alagammal and Ors v Ganesan and Anr CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Hon’ble Justice Vikram Nath DATE :  10th   Janu

A single person cannot be party to arbitration when the arbitration agreement mandates joint holders to be a party : Bombay HC
January 9, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Ketan Champaklal Divecha V DGS Township Pvt. Ltd. & CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Manish Pitale DATE :  2nd January 2024 CITATION : Arbitr

Patent Illegality, Patent Injustice, Redefining Fairness in Award Review: Delhi High Court
Patent Illegality, Patent Injustice, Redefining Fairness in Award Review: Delhi High Court
January 8, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: MBL Infrastructures Limited vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Case No: 12/12/2023 Decided on: O.M.P. (COMM) 311/2021 Coram: The Hon’ble

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { var links = document.querySelectorAll('a'); links.forEach(function(link) { if (link.innerHTML.trim() === 'Career' && link.href === 'https://primelegal.in/contact-us/') { link.href = 'https://primelegal.in/career/'; } }); });