Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
“PLAINTIFF MUST PERSONALLY DEMONSTRATE READINESS AND WILLINGNESS TO FULFILL CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS; THIRD PARTIES TO THE CONTRACT CANNOT ATTEST FOR THESE CONDITIONS” – Madhya Pradesh HC verdict upheld by SC

CASE TITLE – Rajesh Kumar v. Anand Kumar & Ors. CASE NUMBER – Civil Appeal No. 7840 of 2023 DATED ON – 17.05.2024 QUORUM – Justice Pank

SUPREME COURT ISSUES DIRECTIONS PERTAINING TO THE FORMAT OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENTS
March 8, 2024by Primelegal Team0

  CASE TITLE: Thangam And Another v. Navamani Ammal CASE NO: Civil Appeal No. 8935 Of 2011 DECIDED ON: 4.03.2024 QUORUM:  Hon’ble Justice R

DISPLAY OF NAME AND NATURE OF BUSINESS DOES NOT AMOUNT TO ADVERTISEMENT: SUPREME COURT
March 2, 2024by Primelegal Team0

In precedence of the case Bharti Airtel Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh the High Court of Madhya Pradesh declared the demand notices sent to the appell

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { var links = document.querySelectorAll('a'); links.forEach(function(link) { if (link.innerHTML.trim() === 'Career' && link.href === 'https://primelegal.in/contact-us/') { link.href = 'https://primelegal.in/career/'; } }); });