Supreme court reinstates that the widow cannot get a share of mother-in laws property

February 21, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Title: SACHIDHANANDAM SINCE DEAD THROUGH HIS LRS v E. VANAJA AND ORS

Citation: CIVIL APPEAL NO.3667 OF 2018

Dated on: 6.11.2023

Coram: HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R GAVI, JUSTICE HIMA OHIL & JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

In present case involving partition suit entitlements, Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra considered a defendant’s appeal against a High Court verdict and decree. The lawsuit claimed a portion of the properties based on familial relationships and property acquisitions. The Court’s inquiry focused on the interpretation of Hindu female inheritance rules and their rights in intestate succession cases. Finally, the Court’s verdict clarified the plaintiff’s claims, establishing a precedent for future partition suits in similar circumstances.

Brief facts of the case

In the present case the plaintiff (E. Vanaja) is the widow and only heir to Elango, Nallathambi Chettiar’s third son. She filed a partition suit, claiming 1/8th share of the properties indicated in schedules ‘B’, ‘C’, and ‘C1’ as joint family property.

The defendants are Nallathambi Chettiar’s wife, children, and grandchildren. They admitted the parties’ relationship, but opposed the plaintiff’s claim on the grounds that some of the properties were self-acquired or purchased with the defendants’ own money. They also relied on a Will signed by the first defendant (Nagammal), the plaintiff’s mother-in-law.

Court analysis and judgement

The Hon’ble Bench of the Supreme Court considered the facts, legal provisions, and lower court rulings, and concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to a 1/16 share of the properties specified in schedules ‘B’ and ‘C1’34. However, the plaintiff was not entitled to a share of her mother-in-law’s property in the lawsuit. The Court confirmed that all of the disputed properties were joint family properties. The Court evaluated the contested will, but determined that it had no effect on the plaintiff’s share. In summary, the Supreme Court granted the appeal in part, altering the High Court’s decision to provide the plaintiff a share of specified properties while maintaining their joint family status.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written by- Namitha Ramesh

CLICK HERE TO VIEW JUDGEMENT

Primelegal Team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *