Reconsider Rape Convict Asaram’s Plea For 20-Day Parole under 1958 Rules: Rajasthan High Court Directs Committee

July 13, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Asha Ram vs. State Of Rajasthan and others

Case No.: D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 613/2023

Decided on: 10/07/2023

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

Facts of the case:

The bench was essentially dealing with the writ plea filed by Asaram challenging the rejection of his application.

Before the HC, the Counsels appearing for Asaram contended that he was convicted and sentenced by the trial court on April 2018 under Sections 370(4), 342, 506, Section 376(2)(D)(F) IPC read with Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000.

In contrast, the Rules of 2021 came into effect on June 30, 2021, and, as such, his application for parole was liable to be considered under the 1958 Parole Rules and not as per the provisions of the Rules of 2021.

On the other hand, the AAG, though opposed his writ petition, however, he could not dispute the position that Asaram’s application for releasing him on 20 days’ parole is liable to be considered as per the provisions of the Rules of 1958 as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Hitesh @ Bavko Shivshankar Dave Vs. State of Gujarat 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 72. It may be noted that in Hitesh’s (supra) case, the Apex Court had held that “in determining the entitlement of a convict for premature release, the policy of the State Government on the date of the of the conviction is subsequently liberalised to provide more beneficial terms, those should also be borne in mind.”

Judgement:

The decision taken by the District Parole Advisory Committee, Jodhpur in its meeting dated 20.06.2023, refusing to grant parole of 20 days’ to the petitioner, is hereby set aside and the respondents are directed to consider the application filed by the petitioner for releasing him on 20 days’ parole afresh in accordance with the provisions of the Rules of 1958, instead of the provisions of the Rules of 2021, within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

This parole writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

 

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written by: Mahima Saini

click to view a judgement

 

Primelegal Team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *