The petitioner was apprehended under Sections 420 IPC, “Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property”, section 506, “Punishment for
The petitioner was apprehended under Sections 420 IPC, “Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property”, section 506, “Punishment for
The petitioner was arrested under Sections 341 IPC, “Punishment for wrongful restraint”, section 323, “Punishment for voluntarily causing hur
Tender based documents, however being very much similar, having different clauses, can’t be treated similarly and no such discrimination issue wi
Petitioner No.2 and 3 were arrested under Section 448, IPC, “Punishment for house-trespass”, section 341, “Punishment for wrongful restraint
In the present case, an appeal has been filed u/s-173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 against the order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribun
If an employee is prevented by the employer from performing his duties, the employee cannot be blamed for having not worked, and the principle of &
The appellate authority under the RTI (Right to Information) Act of the Securities and Exchange Board of India comprising of Mr. Anand Baiwar adjud
“Given the above-mentioned settled legal position, it is clear that the complaint cannot be thrown at the threshold even if it does not make a sp
It was first Started when the separate petition was filed against Reliance Infratel Ltd., Reliance Telecom Ltd., and Reliance Communications Ltd. (
The value as determinable for computation of court fee and value for the purposes of jurisdiction shall be the same. No party to the litigation is