Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Concealment of Infertility as Fraud: Delhi High Court Upholds Annulment under Section 12(1)(c) HMA
Concealment of Infertility as Fraud: Delhi High Court Upholds Annulment under Section 12(1)(c) HMA
September 5, 2025by Primelegal Team

Facts This appeal arises out of Section 19(1)(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, read with Section 151 CPC, 1908, associated with the order dated 0

Allahabad HC Balances Spousal Independence and Child’s Right: Wife’s Maintenance Set Aside
Allahabad HC Balances Spousal Independence and Child’s Right: Wife’s Maintenance Set Aside
September 5, 2025by Primelegal Team

Facts The Saurabh Srivastava (Revisionist) married to opposite party no.2 on 14.12.2014 according to Hindu rites and rituals at Lucknow.  Out the

Delhi HC Rules on Equitable Maintenance: Parashar v. Sapna
Delhi HC Rules on Equitable Maintenance: Parashar v. Sapna
September 5, 2025by Primelegal Team

  Facts The petitioner, Ankush Kumar Parashar was married to respondent no. 1 Sapna @ Mona on 2nd July, 2017 as per Hindu rites. A son, Master

MANIPUR HC UPHOLDS DEMOCRATIC TENURE LIMITS, QUASHES LAW EXTENDING PANCHAYAT MEMBERS’ TERM
MANIPUR HC UPHOLDS DEMOCRATIC TENURE LIMITS, QUASHES LAW EXTENDING PANCHAYAT MEMBERS’ TERM
September 2, 2025by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND   Gradually promoting the Constitution’s promise of a democratic system, the Hon’ble Manipur High Court ruled

JUSTICE DELAYED: SC DIRECTS CHIEF JUSTICE’S INTERVENTION IF HC FAILS TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT WITHIN 3 MONTHS
JUSTICE DELAYED: SC DIRECTS CHIEF JUSTICE’S INTERVENTION IF HC FAILS TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT WITHIN 3 MONTHS
September 1, 2025by Primelegal Team

Introduction   Although the right to prompt justice is a fundamental component of constitutional democracy, the public’s trust in the legal

Bombay HC Clarifies Validity of Entertainment Duty on Online Ticket Convenience Fees
Bombay HC Clarifies Validity of Entertainment Duty on Online Ticket Convenience Fees
August 14, 2025by Primelegal Team

Case Name: FICCI v. State of Maharashtra Case Number: Writ Petition No.1813 of 2016 and Writ Petition No.1689 of 2015 Date of Judgment: 6 August 20

Supreme Court Divided on Limitation Period for Assessment Orders Under Section 144C Income Tax Act
Supreme Court Divided on Limitation Period for Assessment Orders Under Section 144C Income Tax Act
August 12, 2025by Primelegal Team

Introduction The thin line between the powers granted for revenue collection and the protection granted to the taxpayer necessitates compliance wit

SUPREME COURT UPHELD THE JUDGEMENT OF HIGH COURT IN CONVICTING THE APPELLANT UNDER SECTION – 302 OF IPC.
SUPREME COURT UPHELD THE JUDGEMENT OF HIGH COURT IN CONVICTING THE APPELLANT UNDER SECTION – 302 OF IPC.
June 27, 2024by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: NANHE  VERSUS STATE OF U.P. CASE NUMBER: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2791OF 2023. DATED ON: NOVEMBER 21, 2023 QUORUM: HON’BLE JUSTICE ABHAY S

Justice Served to 9-Year-Old: Sikkim High Court Dismisses Phurba Lepcha’s Appeal
Justice Served to 9-Year-Old: Sikkim High Court Dismisses Phurba Lepcha’s Appeal
June 11, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title: Phurba Lepcha vs. State of Sikkim Case No.: Crl.A. No.24 of 2023 Dated on: 5th June, 2024 Coram: The Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi M