Introduction Recently the Delhi High Court A Bench of Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Shail Jain passed the order which sets clear boundaries on the
Introduction Recently the Delhi High Court A Bench of Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Shail Jain passed the order which sets clear boundaries on the
Facts This appeal arises out of Section 19(1)(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, read with Section 151 CPC, 1908, associated with the order dated 0
Facts The petitioner, Ankush Kumar Parashar was married to respondent no. 1 Sapna @ Mona on 2nd July, 2017 as per Hindu rites. A son, Master
Case Name: Ferrero S.p.A. et al. v. M.B. Enterprises. Case Number: CS (Community) 593 of 2021. Judgment Date: July 28, 2025. Judge/Bench: Justice S
In his appeal against the Delhi High Court’s suspension of his bail, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal sought quick relief from the Supreme Cour
The Delhi Police has informed the High Court of Delhi that smaller teams from their existing strength of five bomb disposal squads and 18 bomb dete
Case title: RAJ KUMAR VS STATE Case no: CRL. A. 191/2002 Order on: May 22, 2024 Qoram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI Fact of the ca
CASE NUMBER- W.P.(C) 4455/2017 & CM APPL. 19463/2017 DATED ON- 14.05.2024 QUORUM- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH FACTS OF THE CASE T
Case Title – Ram Dutt Tyagi vs. State Thr. C.B.I. AND Subhash Chand vs. C.B.I Case No. – CRL.A 779/2002, CRL.A 796/2002 and CRL.M.A. 13709/20
Case Name: Aam Aadmi Party v. Union of India Case Number: W.P.(C) 15929/2023 & CM APPLs. 10225/2024, 19624/2024 & 19666/2024 Date of Deci