Assange’s Unexpected Plea Deal: WikiLeaks Saga Ends with a Twist in Saipan
Julian Assange’s legal saga has taken a surprising turn, bringing an end to years of uncertainty and debate. The WikiLeaks founder, known for
Occupants’ Rights Upheld: Supreme Court Orders Rehabilitation or Compensation Under Town Planning Scheme.
CASE TITLE – Jaffar Ali Nawab Ali Chaudhari & Ors. v. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai CASE NUMBER – Civil Appeal No.… of 2023
Supreme Court Imposes Costs, Criticizes Suppression of Facts in Legal Petitions
BACKGROUND An appeal was brought before the Supreme court by the All-India EPF Staff Federation. The federation challenged an interim order dated M
SUPREME COURT UPHELD AND THE JUDGEMENT OF APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY AND SET ASIDE THE CIVIL APPEAL.
CASE NAME: MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS RATNAGIRI GAS AND POWER PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. CASE NUMBER: CIVIL
Appellate Authority’s Decision to Quash Prosecution Approval Set Aside: The Legality of Ex-Post Facto CTE and Environmental Compliance
Case Title: M/s Sweta Estate Pvt.Ltd. Gurgaon v. Haryana State Pollution Control Board & Anr. Case No: Civil Appeal No.2212 of 2020 Date
SUPREME COURT GIVES ACTIVIST MAHESH RAUT INTERIM BAIL IN THE BHIMA-KOREGAON CASE.
Mahesh Raut, an activist and one of the defendants in the Bhima-Koregaon case, was recently granted interim release by the Supreme Court for two we
Kerala High Court Expands Spousal Testimony Rights in Civil Cases.
Recently, the Kerala High Court ruled in Smitha v. Anil Kumar & Ors that spouses may testify on each other’s behalf during civil case tri
Supreme Court Affirms Arbitrability of Disputes Arising from Tripartite Agreements and Dismisses Fraud Allegations
Case Title: Sushma Shivkumar Daga & Anr. v. Madhurkumar Ramkrishnaji Bajaj & Ors. Case No: C.APL.No.1854/2023 Dated on: 15 December
Supreme Court Issues Notice in Anticipatory Bail Plea; Grants Interim Protection to Petitioner
BACKGROUND The petitioner is a CRPF personnel. The allegation against the Petitioner/Personnel is about using a forged medical certificate to enter
SUPREME COURT SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT OF HIGH COURT AND AWARDED BENEFIT OF DOUBT TO APPELLANT CONVICTED UNDER SECTION – 302 OF IPC.
CASE NAME: PARSHURAM VERSUS STATE OF M.P. CASE NUMBER: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.—– OF 2023. [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 1718 of 2022]
