Court directs State to affix reflectors on all animal carts : Rajasthan High Court
The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judge, Justice Rameshwar Vyas in the case of General Manager Rajasthan State Road Transport Corp., Jai
Bail granted to murder accused who was in custody since 2015 along with her minor daughter: Rajasthan High Court
The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judge, Justice Manoj Kumar Garg in the case of Simorna W/o Jitendra Vaishnav vs State Of Rajasthan (S.
Under Section 23(4) Of Drugs & Cosmetics Act, manufacturer is entitled to receive one sample of seized goods : Rajasthan High Court
The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judge, Justice Birendra Kumar in the case of Vivek Pharmachem (India) Ltd vs State Of Rajasthan (S.B
Source and authenticity are the two hallmarks pertaining to electronic records sought to be used as evidence : Tripura High Court
The Tripura High Court in the case of Shri Khakchang Jamatia vs State Of Tripura (CRL.A (J) NO.10 OF 2020) upheld that source and authenticity are
State To Pay 5 Lakh As Compensation To Parents Of Deceased Because “Police Liable For His Death On Account Of Their Negligence”: Orissa HC
In Purna Chandra Mohapatra and Another v. State of Odisha & Others [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13774 OF 2005], the Orissa High Court recently or
“Forensic Science Forms Integral Part Of Justice Delivery System”: Orissa HC
In the case of Ganeswar Behera v. State of Odisha and another, ( BLAPL No. 7569 of 2020), the Orissa High Court held that Forensic Science Forms In
Homicidal Nature Of Death Need Not Always Be Proved Through Direct Evidence: Orissa HC
In Milan v. State of Odisha (JCRLA No.64 of 2016), the Orissa High Court ruled that homicidal death does not necessarily necessitate direct evidenc
Calcutta high court dismissed a petition as the petitioner has failed to establish any illegality/irregularity on the part of the respondents in terminating the contract of the petitioner, after issuing warning to do so, worth interference by the writ court.
Calcutta high court dismissed a petition as the petitioner has failed to establish any illegality/irregularity on the part of the respondents in te
If a case is barred under the timelines contemplated under section 34(3) ofThe Arbitration Act, 1940 then the petitioner cannot be permitted to take recourse the benefit of section 14 of The Limitation Act: Calcutta High Court
The Judgment in the case of Suresh Kumar Agarwal vs L & T Finance Ltd (AP/214/2017) was served by The Hon’ble JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHAR
These cases cannot assist the petitioners for injuncting IFIN from proceeding in terms of enforcing its right under the Pledge Agreements: Calcutta High.
The judgement in the case of Aditya Khaitan And Ors vs Il And Fs Financial Services (AP/206/2020) was served by The Hon’ble JUSTICE MOUSHUMI
