Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Decision taken by the Bank cannot be said to be arbitrary or perverse or unreasonable as to become unsustainable: High Court Of Andra Pradesh

CASE TITTLE: Sri Puvvada Venkata Mohana Murali Krishna Murthy V The State of Andhra Pradesh, CASE NO: W.P. No.4861 of 2018 DATED ON:  .05.2024 QUO

Intriguing insights from a landmark court decision on interpreting limitation and acknowledgment.

Case Title: M/S VOIR INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR Versus M/S POLYBLENDS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR Case No: C.R.P.

Delhi High Court: Extra judicial confessions are weak pieces of evidence, it is incumbent on the Courts to exercise extra caution while examining the same

CASE TITTLE: ROSHAN  versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) CASE NO: BAIL APPLN. 2478/2023 ORDER ON: 20th May, 2024 QUORUM:  JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJA

“Justice Prevails: Delhi High Court Upholds Detention in Serious Kidnapping and Ransom Case”

Case Title: RAJU Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Case No: BAIL APPLN. 2791/2023 Decided on: 20th May , 2024 Quorum: The Hon’ble JUSTICE AMIT MAH

Delhi HC dismisses appeal; Upholds daughter’s Class I inheritance rights.

CASE TITLE – Ms. Veeneta (Since Deceased) Through Lrs. v. Ms. Jyoti Gupta CASE NUMBER – FAO(OS) 143/2023 & C.M.Nos.67425-67426/2023 DATED O

SC criticizes HC ruling in Terrorism conspiracy case: Also clarified for charge under section 18 of UAPA, showing involvement in the actual commission of a terrorist act under Section 15 of UAPA is not necessary.

CASE TITLE – Union of India v. Barakathulla Etc. CASE NUMBER – CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 2715 – 2719 OF 2024 DATED ON – 22.05.2024 QUORUM

Delhi HC uses ‘doctrine of harmonious construction’; Clarifies forum for appeals in government employee misconduct cases.

CASE TITLE – Khajan Singh v. Union of India and Ors. CASE NUMBER – W.P.(C) 15201/2023, CM APPL. 27067/2024 & W.P.(C) 6465/2024, CM APPL. 26

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitrator’s Rs. 20 Lakh Award for Loss of Profit Due to Lack of Evidence

CASE TITLE – M/S DIVYAM REAL ESTATE PVT LTD v. M/S M2K ENTERTAINMENT PVT LTD CASE NUMBER – O.M.P. (COMM) 162/2020 & I.A. 14331/2012, I.A. 1

Andhra Pradesh High Court Reviews Cooperative Bank’s Decision to Raise Retirement Age from 58 to 60 Years: Clarifies Financial Implications

Andhra Pradesh High Court Reviews Cooperative Bank’s Decision to Raise Retirement Age from 58 to 60 Years: Clarifies Financial Implications 

Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Petition in Challenge of Polling Booth Locations. Reiterates Political Interference Concerns in Remote Locations

Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Petition in Challenge of Polling Booth Locations. Reiterates Political Interference Concerns in Remote Locations

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { var links = document.querySelectorAll('a'); links.forEach(function(link) { if (link.innerHTML.trim() === 'Career' && link.href === 'https://primelegal.in/contact-us/') { link.href = 'https://primelegal.in/career/'; } }); });