Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
THE PLIGHT OF A LONELY WOMAN UNDERTAKING TRAVEL FROM BENGALURU TO CHIKMAGALUR IS QUITE DIFFERENT FROM HUSBAND OR ANY OTHER MEMBER OF HIS FAMILY COMING TO BENGALURU FROM CHIKMAGALUR SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
THE PLIGHT OF A LONELY WOMAN UNDERTAKING TRAVEL FROM BENGALURU TO CHIKMAGALUR IS QUITE DIFFERENT FROM HUSBAND OR ANY OTHER MEMBER OF HIS FAMILY COMING TO BENGALURU FROM CHIKMAGALUR SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
December 19, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Sri. Rahamathulla Khan vs Smt. Umme Salma on 22 November, 2022(CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4878 OF 2021 C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8940 OF

THE GROUND OF PARITY CANNOT BE MADE APPLICABLE TO THE CASE IN HAND CONSIDERING THE SPECIFIC OVERT-ACT ALLEGED BY THE PRESENT PETITIONERS SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
THE GROUND OF PARITY CANNOT BE MADE APPLICABLE TO THE CASE IN HAND CONSIDERING THE SPECIFIC OVERT-ACT ALLEGED BY THE PRESENT PETITIONERS SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
December 19, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of SRI SUBRAMANI @ SUBRAMANI RAO VS STATE OF KARNATAKA ON 22 NOVEMBER 2022(CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9099 OF 2022) presided by THE HONR

ARTICLE ON AFFIDAVIT ON HOW TO MAKE IT AND HOW TO MAKE IT VALID
December 18, 2022by Primelegal Team0

What is an affidavit?  An affidavit (/ˌæfɪˈdeɪvɪt/ (listen) AF-ih-DAY-vit; Medieval Latin for “declared under oath”) is a writte

Double jeopardy
Double jeopardy
December 17, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Double jeopardy, in law, protection against the use by the state of certain multiple forms of prosecution. In general, in countries observing the

Nature and character of subject matter have to be preserved for the effective adjudication of the issues to the suit: the Uttarakhand high court
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Uttarakhand high court passed a judgement on 24th September 2022 in the case C.S Rawat and Shri Yogesh Tiwari v. Shri Animesh Singh (writ appea

Irrespective of the Personal Rights of a person or a community, it can under no set of circumstances, override the rights or need of the defence of the country: The Uttarakhand high court
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Uttarakhand High Court passed a judgement on 4th of March, 2022 in which it subdued the queries of a division bench, which had a query arising

We are of the view that since a notice under Section 400(1) has been issued, the same should be carried to its logical conclusion in accordance with law: Calcutta High Court
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Hamidul Haque v. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors. IA No. GA/1/2022 with OCOT/5

The Tribunal has been thorough with regards to facts and has done a commendable job in contractual facilitation while keeping disputes for future deliberation: Calcutta High Court
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above-mentioned was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case Gainwell Commosales Private Limited v. Minsol Limited, APO / 74 /2022 before

EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY BE “PUBLIC SERVANTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE KL ACT, THEY ARE NOT “GOVERNMENT SERVANTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SAID ACT AS WELL AS CCA RULES SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY BE “PUBLIC SERVANTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE KL ACT, THEY ARE NOT “GOVERNMENT SERVANTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SAID ACT AS WELL AS CCA RULES SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In this matter S G Padmanabha vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2022( W.P. No.50413 OF 2019 (GM-KLA)) presided by THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE

THOUGH THERE IS NO HARD AND FAST RULE AS TO HOW MUCH TIME SHOULD BE TAKEN BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR THE GOVERNMENT FOR CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION, THE TIME TAKEN BY THE STATE GOVERNMENT TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER’S REPRESENTATION IN THE PRESENT CASE IS INORDINATE AND CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS REASONABLE: SAYS KARNATAKA HC
THOUGH THERE IS NO HARD AND FAST RULE AS TO HOW MUCH TIME SHOULD BE TAKEN BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR THE GOVERNMENT FOR CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION, THE TIME TAKEN BY THE STATE GOVERNMENT TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER’S REPRESENTATION IN THE PRESENT CASE IS INORDINATE AND CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS REASONABLE: SAYS KARNATAKA HC
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Mohammed Riyaz vs The State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2022(W.P.H.C. No.74/2022) presided by THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VIS