Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
While exercising the power of judicial review, the High Court should not readily accept the charge of malus animus laid against the State and its functionaries. The burden to prove the charge of malafides is always on the person who moves the court for invalidation of the action of the State and/or its agencies and instrumentalities on the ground that the same is vitiated due to malafides: The Uttarakhand High Court
December 30, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Uttarakhand high court Passed a Judgement on 19th march 2019 in the case Dr. Praveen v. Director General, Indian Council of Forestry Research &

CONTINUE READING
Merely, because of non- examination of the plaintiff in the proceedings of the suit it will not disentitle the plaintiff from getting the relief which is otherwise he or she is able to substantiate by way of other evidences on record and oral testimony of the witness on record: the Uttarakhand high court
December 30, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The high court of Uttarakhand passed a judgment on 16th February 2019 in the case Devkinandan Bhatt & Another v. Smt. Krishna Tiwari & Othe

CONTINUE READING
All of these lead this court to the conclusion that it would be unlawful and grossly misuse the court’s process to allow the criminal prosecution against the petitioner to move forward: Calcutta High Court
December 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Afshan Meerza vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr, C.R.R. 1484 of 2016 With CRAN 9

CONTINUE READING
No evidence was collected by the CBI to prove the above ingredients against the A-2.In considering the entire circumstances I am of view that the charge labelled against the A-2 by the CBI can not prove her guilt in trial: Calcutta High Court
December 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above-mentioned was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Shri Sushanta Dasgupta and Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation, C.R.R.

CONTINUE READING
Sharon Murder Case, High Court Dismisses Bail Application Of Greeshma’s Mother: Kerela High Court
Sharon Murder Case, High Court Dismisses Bail Application Of Greeshma’s Mother: Kerela High Court
December 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Kerala High Court, on Wednesday, dismissed the petition seeking Bail moved by Greeshma’s mother Sindhu, who is one of the accused booked

CONTINUE READING
Thiruvarur Hospital Can Recover ₹5 Lakh Compensation Amount From Doctors, Officials In Medical Negligence Case: Madras High Court
Thiruvarur Hospital Can Recover ₹5 Lakh Compensation Amount From Doctors, Officials In Medical Negligence Case: Madras High Court
December 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Madras High Court Rules That Thiruvarur Hospital Can Recover 5 Lakh In Compensation From Doctors And Officials In Medical Negligence Case The Madra

CONTINUE READING
Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act | ‘Accommodation’ U/S 2 Includes Superstructures: High Court
December 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In a recent ruling, the Chhattisgarh High Court determined that a superstructure is within the scope of the term “accommodation” as def

CONTINUE READING
There cannot be any set of rules or guidelines, which may apply in all cases, under all the circumstances for evaluation of evidence. Evaluation of evidence is a matter, which differs with case to case and even in some cases, it differs from witness to witness: The Uttarakhand high court
December 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The high court of Uttarakhand passed a judgement on 11th January 2019 in the case Rajesh v. state of Uttarakhand (Criminal Appeal No. 01 of 2015).

CONTINUE READING
It is always open to the applicants to avail their legal remedies against any such action taken by the Government. That would, however, not justify their being granted leave to prefer an appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge, since they cannot be said to be aggrieved thereby: The high court of Uttarakhand
December 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The high court of Uttarakhand passed a judgement on Veronica Lal and others v. state of Uttarakhand and others (Special appeal no. 55 of 2019) . th

CONTINUE READING
The Court is of the considered opinion that State permission is required in order to bind the State with the financial responsibility for the appointments to the posts created pursuant to Government Order
December 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Sk. Bashiar Rahaman Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors., WPA 2186 of 2016 was pr

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.