INTRODUCTION
In a major intervention which goes to show how serious sexual offense cases are, the Supreme Court of India has stayed an order passed by the Delhi High Court allowing an accused to be released on bail. The Supreme Court has held that allowing an accused to be released on bail when serious charges are involved, such as rape, has to be watched extremely carefully, especially when issues of safety of complainants, influence on witnesses, and administration of justice are involved.
BACKGROUND
Unnao Rape Case: This refers to allegations of rape made against the accused, which had culminated in his arrest and jail custody. The Delhi High Court had granted bail to the accused on various grounds that included the period of incarceration, the stage of the case, and the right to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Being dissatisfied with the decision on bail, the victim appeals to the Supreme Court, arguing that the High Court erred in not appropriately assessing the nature of the crime, the sensitivity of the victim, and possibly the danger of intimidating or intimidating the victim. It is submitted that an appropriate assessment on bail was not struck between the right of the accused and that of the victim. The case came before the Bench of the Supreme Court, which drew up the case and even looked into whether the High Court was following the established principles on the issuing of bail orders related to sexual offenses.
KEY POINTS
- However, the Supreme Court stayed the execution of the Delhi High Court order on bail and held that the suspect should be detained until further notices are given.
- The Court pointed out that serious offenses like rape need to be examined judicially meticulously at the bail stage since they carry grave consequences for the victim as well as society.
- It was noted that although freedom of personal liberty is a fundamental Right, it must be grounded in consideration for factors like severity of crime, danger of intimidating witnesses, and need for fair trial.
- The Bench held that the bail orders in serious crime matters should be the result of applying thoughtful consideration of the particular set of circumstances rather than the general principles.
- The Court is concerned with the potential effect of bail on the victim’s feelings of security and cooperation with the trial process.
- The Supreme Court clarified that its stay order was of interim relief and that the validity of the bail order of the High Court would be assessed at the final hearing.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The Supreme Court over the past years has emphasized the need to tread with care while granting bail in sexual offense cases where the complainant raises suspicions of threats or intimidation. Various cases have brought forth the fact that it is essential for the court to take a victim-friendly approach without disregarding the rights of the accused. This intervention has come as part of the overall effort by the judiciary to make bail case judgments on sexual offenses sensitive to the ground reality, including the issues of equality and social pressure that victims are subjected to. It has also been noted that the stay would result in the High Courts giving reasons to the bail offenses.
CONCLUSION
The Supreme Court’s decision to reserve its bail ruling in the Unnao rape case and await the stay order on the bail decision by the Delhi High Court in a rape case is in line with its cautious exercise of bail discretion in any serious rape case. Although the presumption of innocence and liberty are the bedrocks of any criminal jurisprudence, this particular decision is a reminder of another important cornerstone worth upholding in this matter: upholding justice and protecting the victim in a rape case. The eventual outcome of this case will also settle the standards applicable to bail in a criminal matter such as rape.
“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal falls into the category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”
WRITTEN BY: ARCHITHA MANIKANTAN
