Allahabad High Court rules that an intra-court appeal against a single judge’s decision not to pursue contempt proceedings cannot be maintained.

Title: Vinod Kumar Gupta And Another vs. Sri Veer Bahadur Yadav, S.D.M. And Another

 Decided on: 9th May, 2023.

[SPECIAL APPEAL No. – 234 of 2023]

CORAM: Hon’ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon’ble Vikas Budhwar,J.

 Introduction.

 The Allahabad High Court has stated that an intra-court appeal against the Single Judge’s decision to not file a complaint of contempt against the putative contemnor is not permissible. No appeal is maintainable against the dismissal of contempt proceedings against the defendant under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, as the remedy lies under Article 136 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court.

Analysis.

The court observed that an appeal can only be maintained in situations where the contempt jurisdiction has been used to address the merits of the disagreement between the parties in order to carry out the judgement or order, and the latter has been found to have been issued in accordance with the authority granted by Article 226 of the Constitution.

The Division bench of the HC determined that Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court does not permit the current intra-court appeal against the judgement and order of the Single Judge (dated March 17, 2023) declining to initiate contempt proceedings to be maintained, and the same was dismissed.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written by- Varada Hawaldar

click to view judgement

 

 

Primelegal Team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *