Discharge from Public Duty Is Completely irrelevant to Separation from Service: MP HIGHCOURT

September 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Recently, a writ case was rejected by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on the grounds that the petitioner was challenging a termination order given by a private unaided minority institution in accordance with its own rules.

The Court ruled that the petition could not be maintained since the bylaws lacked statutory authority, and as a result, the issuing of the order of termination could not be considered “an act in performance of public duty.”

The case of SMT.PRAMILAL TIWARI versus SATNA DIOCESAN SOCIETY AND ORS. Was led by learned Justice M.S. Bhatti.

FACTS OF THE CASE

The Respondent/Society ran a school, and the Petitioner wanted to rescind her dismissal as an employee. Dissatisfied, the Petitioner filed a writ petition asking the court to reverse the impugned termination judgement and restore her with all of her previous perks intact.

The respondents filed a preliminary objection claiming that the petition lacked merit. given the character of their Institution and the fact that the contentious issue arose from terms and circumstances outlined in its bylaws, which lacked the authority of law. Respondents cited the St. Mary’s Education Society decision in arguing that a writ petition against a private unaided educational institution is not viable since the Petitioner’s terms of service were not subject to any applicable statutes. For this reason, it was argued, the petition should be denied.

JUDGEMENT

Based on the foregoing, the Court determined that the issuing of the challenged order did not violate any statutes or rules or have any connection to the performance of any public duty. Since the organisation at issue was found to be a private, non-profit minority educational institution, the court ruled that the writ petition against the Respondent/Society was without merit. Thus, the petition was denied.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

JUDGEMENT REVEIWED BY DEEPA BAJAJ

CLICK HERE TO VIEW JUDGEMENT

Primelegal Team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *