#SupremeCourt Archives - Page 19 of 27 - Prime Legal Law Firm Blogs

Constitutional Courts should refrain from directives unless exceptional circumstances warrant them.: Supreme court.

High Court Bar Association v. State of U.P. & Ors Judgement is been delivered by Chief Justice of India, Dr Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Justice

The Amendment of the Plaint, which sought to challenge decree, was time barred and sue diligences was not demonstrated: Supreme Court

In the case of Basavaraj vs. Indira and Others revolves around an appeal in the Supreme Court of India concerning an amendment sought by responden

Nomination does not imply the absolute rights over the deceased persons property: Supreme Court

The case of Shakti Yezdani vs Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar (Civil Appeal No. 7107 of 2017) is that the appellants in this case, who are the le

Producing the documents during cross examination is permissible under law: Supreme Court

The case of Mohammed Abdul Wahid Vs Nilofer & Anr. (Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.14445 of 2021), there were two contradictory judgements by

The Counsels reached an amicable resolution to the issue at hand through mutual agreement among the parties in the Supreme Court.

In the case of K. Balasubramani vs. The Tamil Nadu Government (Special Leave Petition(C)Nos.8251-8252/2022), the petitioners are tenants in various

The order-issuing process has serious consequences. Such orders necessitate the application of thought and cannot be issued casually: Supreme court

Section 202(1) of the Cr.PC states that if an accused resides outside the area over which the learned Magistrate has jurisdiction, the issue of pro

The supreme court court overturned the high court’s order to dismiss the contempt application due to noncompliance.

Case title: Domco Smokeless Fuels Pvt Ltd vs State Of Jharkhand Case no.: SLP(Civil) No(s). 34194 of 2016 Decided on: 22.02.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble

NCDRC overstepped its authority and jurisdiction by disregarding the Agreement’s binding covenants: Supreme court

Case title: Venkataraman Krishnamurthy vs Lodha Crown Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. Case no.: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 971 OF 2023 Decided on: 22.02.2024 Quorum: Hon

Appellants must include accurate copies of the Trial Court’s and First Appellate Court’s judgements in their filings: Supreme Court

Case title: Tehsildar, Urban Improvement Trust vs Ganga Bai Menariya. Case no.: Civil Appeal No.722 Of 2012 Decided on: 20.02.2024 Quorum: Hon’bl

If there are inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony, failure to recover the weapon of crime would be fatal to the prosecution’s case: Supreme Court

Case title: Ram Singh Vs State of U.P Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 206 Of 2024 Decided on: 21.02.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Abhay S. Oka, Hon�

Blogs And Articles