Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Delhi High court Dismissed the petition filed by TV 18 Broadcast, seeking Interim injunction.

Title: TV 18 BROADCAST LTD. Vs BENNETT, COLEMAN AND COMPANY LIMITED Judgement Delivered: 04.07.23 + CS(COMM) 279/2022 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE

Delhi High court rejected the Review petition filed by Statesman Limited seeks to review the judgement passed by the high court.

Title: The StatesMan Limited vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Decision: 04.07.23 + REVIEW PET. 516/2019 and CM APPL. 53531/2019, CM APPL. 12275/

Delhi High court granted bail to an accused under the offence of Kidnapping, as per their authority under section 439 of CrPC.

Title: Shah Alam vs State Govt. of NCT Delhi Reserved: 01.06.2023 Pronounced: 07.06.2023 BAIL APPLN. 1033/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS M

Delhi High court passed an order directing the Petitioner/tenants to pay use and occupation charges.

Title: MURARI CHAUHAN & ANR vs KAILASH NARAIN MALHOTRA Decided on: 21.06.2023 + RC.REV. 174/2019 & CM APPL. 13057/2019 and CM APPL. 40082/2

Landmark Ruling: Karnataka High Court Downgrades Conviction, Sentences Man for Grievous Hurt Instead of Attempted Murder, in Testicle Squeezing Case
Landmark Ruling: Karnataka High Court Downgrades Conviction, Sentences Man for Grievous Hurt Instead of Attempted Murder, in Testicle Squeezing Case
June 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Karnataka High Court Parameshwarappa V. The State CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 242 OF 2012 Bench-   HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN Decided On 01-06-

Karnataka High Court Rules: Married Woman Cannot Allege Cheating by Man for Breach of Promise of Marriage
Karnataka High Court Rules: Married Woman Cannot Allege Cheating by Man for Breach of Promise of Marriage
June 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Karnataka High Court Prajith R v. XXX & ANR CRIMINAL PETITION No.544 OF 2021 Bench-  HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA Decided On 16-0

ANALYSIS OF A DEFAMATION JUDGMENT: SCOPE OF SPECIAL LEAVE AND APPRECIATION OF EVIDENCE
ANALYSIS OF A DEFAMATION JUDGMENT: SCOPE OF SPECIAL LEAVE AND APPRECIATION OF EVIDENCE

INTRODUCTION The High Court of Bombay passed a judgement on 19 April 2023. In the case of UTTAM MANULAL KALE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR IN

Valid notice is necessary to release land from reservation after ten- year period: Bombay High Court
Valid notice is necessary to release land from reservation after ten- year period: Bombay High Court

 INTRODUCTION The High Court of Bombay passed a judgement on 04 May 2023 in the realm of land development and town planning, legal provisions play

In our opinion the order passed by the Tribunal warrants no interference. No substantial questions of law arise in the present appeal: Bombay High court
In our opinion the order passed by the Tribunal warrants no interference. No substantial questions of law arise in the present appeal: Bombay High court

The High Court of Bombay passed a judgement on 04 May 2023, in a recent legal battle under the Income Tax Act. The case of PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCO

Land Reservation for Public Parking Lapsed Due to the Authorities’ failure to take necessary steps for acquisition: Bombay High Court
Land Reservation for Public Parking Lapsed Due to the Authorities’ failure to take necessary steps for acquisition: Bombay High Court

INTRODUCTION: The High Court of Bombay passed a judgement on 04 May 2023 stating that that a land reservation for public parking, which had been in