Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
DENIAL OF CHILDCARE LEAVE HELD AS VIOLATION OF LAW
DENIAL OF CHILDCARE LEAVE HELD AS VIOLATION OF LAW

ABSTRACT When an employee is not given childcare leave even if they are eligible it goes against the service rules and is unfair to working parents

PREJUDICE MUST BE PROVEN TO CHALLENGE DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
PREJUDICE MUST BE PROVEN TO CHALLENGE DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

ABSTRACT   The Supreme Court of India, in a recent ruling, shed light on the parameters of the principles of natural justice in the case of di

DISABILITY CANNOT BE TREATED UNEQUALLY EVEN FOR RETIREMENT BENEFITS
DISABILITY CANNOT BE TREATED UNEQUALLY EVEN FOR RETIREMENT BENEFITS

Case Name: Kashmiri Lal Sharma v. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd. & Anr. Case No.: Civil Appeal Nos. of 2025 (from SLP (C) Nos. 1

MURDER, POLITICAL VENDETTA, AND COLLAPSE OF EVIDENCE
MURDER, POLITICAL VENDETTA, AND COLLAPSE OF EVIDENCE

Case Name: Agniraj & Ors. v. State through Deputy Superintendent of Police CB-CID Case Number: Criminal Appeal Nos. 1686–1688 of 2023 Date of

SUPREME COURT TAKES STRONG STAND ON FALSE FIRS
SUPREME COURT TAKES STRONG STAND ON FALSE FIRS

INTRODUCTION   On the 28 May 2025, the Supreme Court of India ordered that no more FIRs should be filed against a couple from the Uttar Prades

TRADEMARK SIMILARITY HINGES ON DOMINANT FEATURES
TRADEMARK SIMILARITY HINGES ON DOMINANT FEATURES

Introduction In a landmark ruling, the Delhi High Court has interpreted the interface between the “anti-dissection rule” and the doctri

CONSPIRACY TO MISAPPROPRIATE MINIMUM SUPPORT PRICE (MSP) SCHEME FUNDS
CONSPIRACY TO MISAPPROPRIATE MINIMUM SUPPORT PRICE (MSP) SCHEME FUNDS

Case Name: State represented by Inspector of Police, CBI, ACB, Visakhapatnam v. Eluri Srinivasa Chakravarthi & Ors. Case Number: Criminal Appea

DISCHARGE IN PREDICATE OFFENCE NOT ENOUGH TO QUASH PMLA PROCEEDINGS
DISCHARGE IN PREDICATE OFFENCE NOT ENOUGH TO QUASH PMLA PROCEEDINGS

Case Name: Niket Kansal v. Union of India through ED Case No.: CRM(M) No. 140/2025 Date of Judgment: 22 May 2025 Judge: Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

PARTIAL LEGAL BAR CAN’T JUSTIFY ENTIRE PLAINT REJECTION:SC
PARTIAL LEGAL BAR CAN’T JUSTIFY ENTIRE PLAINT REJECTION:SC

Introduction The Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed an important procedural principle of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908—that a plaint canno

STAND OF THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT QUESTIONED
STAND OF THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT QUESTIONED

INTRODUCTION On 26 May 2025, the Supreme Court of India asked the Central Government to explain its stand on giving compensation to victims of chil