Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The Kerala High Court stated that judicial separation cannot be given as an alternative when divorce grounds under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act are unproven.
The Kerala High Court stated that judicial separation cannot be given as an alternative when divorce grounds under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act are unproven.
October 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: S v. D & connected matter Decided on: 18, September 2023 Writ C No. – 148/2014 CORAM: The Honorable Mr. Justice Anil. K. Narendran

To prove undervaluation in customs duty cases, the Supreme Court requires evidence of contemporaneous import prices, or else the benefit of the doubt favors the importer.
To prove undervaluation in customs duty cases, the Supreme Court requires evidence of contemporaneous import prices, or else the benefit of the doubt favors the importer.
October 11, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai v. M/s Ganpati Overseas through its Proprietor Shri Yashpal Sharma & Anr Decided on: 06 O

The Allahabad High Court criticized the National Minorities Commission for overstepping its authority and summoning officers without valid grounds.
The Allahabad High Court criticized the National Minorities Commission for overstepping its authority and summoning officers without valid grounds.
October 11, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Divine Faith Fellowship Church and Another vs. State of U.P. And 5 Others 2023 Decided on: 26th September, 2023 Writ no. – C No.

Delhi Court Upholds Interim Mandatory Injunction in a Recent Jurisdiction and Lien Dispute Case    
Delhi Court Upholds Interim Mandatory Injunction in a Recent Jurisdiction and Lien Dispute Case   
September 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: COGOPORT PRIVATE LIMITED v. STRIDES PHARMA SCIENCE LIMITED & ORS  Date of Decision: 22nd September 2023  Case Number: FAO(OS) (CO

Madras High Court Says the Civil Court has no jurisdiction over a company case as per Sections 242(2)(i) and Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Madras High Court Says the Civil Court has no jurisdiction over a company case as per Sections 242(2)(i) and Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013.
September 13, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:    K. Prabhu Vs.  G. Reghukumaran. Decided On: September 11, 2023. C.R.P.(MD)No.535 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014. CORAM:

Reliance On Wrong Precedent Renders Decision ‘Erroneous’, Can’t Be Corrected Under ‘Review Jurisdiction’: Allahabad High Court
Reliance On Wrong Precedent Renders Decision ‘Erroneous’, Can’t Be Corrected Under ‘Review Jurisdiction’: Allahabad High Court
August 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

CASE TITLE: M/S Vaid Organics and Chemical Industries Ltd. Lko. Thru. Its Director Swarn Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Industries U.

The court has jurisdiction in letters patent since the suit is filed in the original side of the Court: Madras High Court.
The court has jurisdiction in letters patent since the suit is filed in the original side of the Court: Madras High Court.
July 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE: ITC Limited Vs. Britannia Industries Ltd. Decided On: July 14, 2023. A.No.3314 of 2023 in C.S.(Comm Div).No.153 of 2023. CORAM:  Hon’

Delhi High court Dismissed the petition filed by TV 18 Broadcast, seeking Interim injunction.

Title: TV 18 BROADCAST LTD. Vs BENNETT, COLEMAN AND COMPANY LIMITED Judgement Delivered: 04.07.23 + CS(COMM) 279/2022 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE

Delhi High court rejected the Review petition filed by Statesman Limited seeks to review the judgement passed by the high court.

Title: The StatesMan Limited vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Decision: 04.07.23 + REVIEW PET. 516/2019 and CM APPL. 53531/2019, CM APPL. 12275/

Delhi High court granted bail to an accused under the offence of Kidnapping, as per their authority under section 439 of CrPC.

Title: Shah Alam vs State Govt. of NCT Delhi Reserved: 01.06.2023 Pronounced: 07.06.2023 BAIL APPLN. 1033/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS M