Limits of Judicial Intervention in Recruitment Matters
Case Name: Sahid Khan Vs. L Rahmathullah and Ors. Case Number: Civil Appeal No. 17308 of 2017 Date: 20 February, 2025 Quorum: Justice Pamidighantam
Supreme Court Questions Delhi HC’s Senior Designation Process, Issues Notices
Introduction In a significant development, the Supreme Court has now raised an eyebrow over the process adopted by the Delhi High Court to choose i
JUDGEMENT REVIEW: GRATUITY CAN BE FOREFEITED IF IMMORAL PRACTICES CAN BE PROVED WITHOUT CONVICTION
Case Title: Western CoalFields Ltd vs. Manohar Govinda Fulzele Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: 2025 INSC 233 Bench: Justice Sudhanshu Dhuli
UNION OF INDIA VS. KANHAIYA PRASAD: SUPREME COURT SETS ASIDE BAIL GRANT UNDER PMLA FOR MONEY LAUNDERING ALLEGATIONS
Case Details Case Name: The Union of India vs. Kanhaiya Prasad Case Number: Criminal Appeal No. 728 of 2025 (@ SLP (Crl.) No. 7140 of 2024) Date: F
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AN EMERGNCE FIELD IN COPYRIGHT LAW: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL CONCERN
ABSTRACT The rapidly growth of Artificial Intelligence in the area of medical science, transportation, aviation, space, education, entertainment an
“JUDICIAL SCRUTINY IN PUBLIC APPONTMENTS: THE LEGALITY OF LEADERSHIP AND EXPERIENCE IN THE SELECTION OF CHARIMAN OF NCH”
Case Name: Dr. Amaragouda Patil vs Union of India & Ors Case Number: Civil Appeal NOS.301–303 OF 2025 Date: February 12, 2025 Quorum: NS Sa
JUDGEMENT REVIEW : SUPREME COURT ASKS FOR STRICTER BAIL PROCESS IN PMLA CASE
Case Name: The Union of India Through The Assistant Director vs. Kanhaiya Prasad Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: 2025 INSC 210 Bench: Justi
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. PRISM CEMENT LTD.: SC UPHOLDS TAX EXEMPTIONS AGAINST RETROSPECTIVE POLICY CHANGES
Case Details: Case Name:- The State of Maharashtra & Ors. vs. Prism Cement Limited Case Number:- Civil Appeal No. 13928 of 2015 Date: 12/02/2
ARTICLE 226: WRIT COURTS MAY REFUSE ACTION IF JUSTICE REQUIRES
INTRODUCTION Article 226 of the Indian Constitution empowers High Courts to issue writs in aid of the enforcement of fundamental rights and other l
JUDGEMENT REVIEW : COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT IS A MATTER OF POLICY AND CANNOT BE DECIDED BY COURTS
Case Name: Canara Bank vs. Ajithkumar G. Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: 2025 INSC 184 Bench: Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Prashant K
